Fix invalid http://asciidoctor.org references #1196
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
* Applied https where applicable * Updated JavaDoc references to current links in https://docs.asciidoctor.org/ Fixes asciidoctor#1195
|
kudos @mojavelinux almost all of the old links redirect to the newer equivalent so the changes were trivial 🎉 |
|
That's great to hear! I'd be happy to add any redirects that are missing. Just let me know. |
I wouldn't bother, and I went for an as-is update in the PR. |
|
Thank you so much for this! 🙌 |
5 tasks
abelsromero
deleted the
issue-1195-fix-invalid-http-asciidoctor-org-references
branch
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Kind of change
Description
What is the goal of this pull request?
Fix invalid http://asciidoctor.org references found in docs and JavaDocs.
How does it achieve that?
Are there any alternative ways to implement this?
No.
Are there any implications of this pull request? Anything a user must know?
No.
Issue
Fixes #1195
Release notes
Please add a corresponding entry to the file CHANGELOG.adoc