Skip to content

Conversation

@dcandler
Copy link
Contributor

The aarch64r soft_nofp variants will fail to build using newlib. The aarch64a soft_nofp variants are already disabled in newlib/llvmlibc builds due to missing support, so the aarch64r should be similarly limited to picolibc.

The aarch64r soft_nofp variants will fail to build using newlib. The
aarch64a soft_nofp variants are already disabled in newlib/llvmlibc
builds due to missing support, so the aarch64r should be similarly
limited to picolibc.
@dcandler dcandler merged commit 5e2a5fb into arm:arm-software Feb 24, 2025
@dcandler dcandler deleted the aarch64r_nofp branch February 26, 2025 11:16
simpal01 pushed a commit to simpal01/arm-toolchain that referenced this pull request Feb 28, 2025
…rm#110)

The aarch64r soft_nofp variants will fail to build using newlib. The
aarch64a soft_nofp variants are already disabled in newlib/llvmlibc
builds due to missing support, so the aarch64r should be similarly
limited to picolibc.
simpal01 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 28, 2025
…110)

The aarch64r soft_nofp variants will fail to build using newlib. The
aarch64a soft_nofp variants are already disabled in newlib/llvmlibc
builds due to missing support, so the aarch64r should be similarly
limited to picolibc.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants