Skip to content

Conversation

@dcandler
Copy link
Contributor

The Additional unrolling in LTO patch has been rebased against an upstream change, while Prefer MEMCPY LDM/STM inlining for v7-m has had the original commit message restored in order to provide context for the change.

The filenames now also match the subject of the commit message, as they have been regenerated using git format-patch.

The `Additional unrolling in LTO` patch has been rebased against an
upstream change, while `Prefer MEMCPY LDM/STM inlining for v7-m`
has had the original commit message restored in order to provide
context for the change.

The filenames now also match the subject of the commit message,
as they have been regenerated using git format-patch.
@VladiKrapp-Arm VladiKrapp-Arm self-requested a review February 21, 2025 13:26
Copy link
Contributor

@VladiKrapp-Arm VladiKrapp-Arm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@dcandler dcandler merged commit 68a0dea into arm:arm-software Feb 21, 2025
@dcandler dcandler deleted the update_perf_patch branch February 21, 2025 13:47
pratlucas pushed a commit to pratlucas/arm-toolchain that referenced this pull request Feb 28, 2025
The `Additional unrolling in LTO` patch has been rebased against an
upstream change, while `Prefer MEMCPY LDM/STM inlining for v7-m` has had
the original commit message restored in order to provide context for the
change.

The filenames now also match the subject of the commit message, as they
have been regenerated using git format-patch.
pratlucas pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 28, 2025
The `Additional unrolling in LTO` patch has been rebased against an
upstream change, while `Prefer MEMCPY LDM/STM inlining for v7-m` has had
the original commit message restored in order to provide context for the
change.

The filenames now also match the subject of the commit message, as they
have been regenerated using git format-patch.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants