Skip to content

Conversation

@hrkrshnn
Copy link
Contributor

@hrkrshnn hrkrshnn commented Jun 8, 2021

No description provided.

@hrkrshnn hrkrshnn requested a review from ekpyron June 8, 2021 09:28
Copy link
Collaborator

@ekpyron ekpyron left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There's a few things that would be nice to have for this:

  • Comparing legacy vs ir optimized.
  • Comparing between arbitrary branches.
  • Distinguishing between code size cost and runtime gas cost (that would first need support in the isoltest expectations and emitted there, though - but that should actually be feasible to do there and generally be nice).

But none of it is too important and it's nice to have as is as well :-).

Note that the changes to semantic tests have to be committed.

Assumes that there is a remote named ``origin`` pointing to the Solidity github
repository. The changes are compared against ``origin/develop``.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If anyone ever has too much time, it'd be nice to have an optional argument for this that just defaults to origin/develop.

@hrkrshnn hrkrshnn enabled auto-merge June 8, 2021 10:00
@hrkrshnn hrkrshnn merged commit 215bbe2 into develop Jun 8, 2021
@hrkrshnn hrkrshnn deleted the script_gas_test branch June 8, 2021 11:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants