Skip to content

Move "Staff" category to lower position in category list #567

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 18, 2025

Conversation

per1234
Copy link
Collaborator

@per1234 per1234 commented Jan 18, 2025

The "Staff" category is used for internal discussions by Arduino Forum staff (moderators and administrators). Although the category does serve an important purpose, it is infrequently used.

Previously the category was placed at the very top of the category list. This prominent placement was not proportionate to its usage. By moving it to a position below the categories that are more frequently used by staff members, the user experience will be improved for the staff members.

The "Staff" category is used for internal discussions by Arduino Forum staff (moderators and administrators). Although
the category does serve an important purpose, it is infrequently used.

Previously the category was placed at the very top of the category list. This prominent placement was not proportionate
to its usage. By moving it to a position below the categories that are more frequently used by staff members, the user
experience will be improved for the staff members.
@per1234 per1234 added type: enhancement Proposed improvement topic: code Related to content of the project itself labels Jan 18, 2025
@per1234 per1234 self-assigned this Jan 18, 2025
@per1234 per1234 merged commit a80da69 into arduino:main Jan 18, 2025
15 checks passed
@per1234 per1234 deleted the lower-staff-category-position branch January 18, 2025 14:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
topic: code Related to content of the project itself type: enhancement Proposed improvement
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant