Remove the WebMaker class in favor of a partial Program class #507
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
BENEFITS:
We remove the WebMaker class which will lower the cognitive load for new users of the repo.
WebMaker sounds like it's something important and not purely an assembly reference
We move away from TStartup in favor of TProgram
.NET have moved away from the Startup class as a concept and now we can align the codebase with that ideology. Also improves the usability for developers who started using .NET in more recent versions, after Startup.cs was scrapped. (would reduce any questions as to why is this called TStartup, for which you have to go down the history annals of .NET)