fix: TASK-#15126 Airtable queries able to show the total count of rec… #34467
Conversation
…ount of records.
WalkthroughThe changes made in Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
app/client/src/pages/Editor/QueryEditor/QueryDebuggerTabs.tsx (1)
Line range hint
145-145: Remove unnecessary double negation.The static analysis tool flagged the use of double negation which is unnecessary. Simplifying this will enhance code readability and performance slightly.
- !!responseDisplayFormat?.title + responseDisplayFormat?.title
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- app/client/src/pages/Editor/QueryEditor/QueryDebuggerTabs.tsx (2 hunks)
Additional context used
Biome
app/client/src/pages/Editor/QueryEditor/QueryDebuggerTabs.tsx
[error] 145-145: Avoid redundant double-negation. (lint/complexity/noExtraBooleanCast)
It is not necessary to use double-negation when a value will already be coerced to a boolean.
Unsafe fix: Remove redundant double-negation
| const parsedOutput = JSON.parse(actionResponse.body); | ||
| console.log("Parsed output:", parsedOutput); | ||
| if (Array.isArray(parsedOutput)) { | ||
| output = parsedOutput; | ||
| } else if (parsedOutput.records && Array.isArray(parsedOutput.records)) { | ||
| output = parsedOutput.records; | ||
| } else { | ||
| output = [parsedOutput]; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Refactor JSON parsing logic for clarity and error handling.
The current approach to parsing the JSON response and handling different data structures is a bit convoluted. It's great to see the handling of different formats, but this can be made cleaner and more robust.
- Error Handling: There's a catch block for JSON parsing errors, which is good. However, the error itself is not logged or handled beyond creating a default output structure. This might obscure the underlying issue when debugging.
- Code Duplication: The logic to check and assign
outputbased on whether it's an array or contains arecordsarray is repeated for both parsed JSON objects and other object types.
Consider refactoring this to reduce duplication and improve error visibility.
function parseResponseData(responseBody) {
try {
const parsed = JSON.parse(responseBody);
if (Array.isArray(parsed)) {
return parsed;
} else if (parsed.records && Array.isArray(parsed.records)) {
return parsed.records;
}
return [parsed];
} catch (e) {
console.error("Error parsing response:", e);
return [{ response: responseBody }];
}
}
// Usage
output = parseResponseData(actionResponse.body);Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const parsedOutput = JSON.parse(actionResponse.body); | |
| console.log("Parsed output:", parsedOutput); | |
| if (Array.isArray(parsedOutput)) { | |
| output = parsedOutput; | |
| } else if (parsedOutput.records && Array.isArray(parsedOutput.records)) { | |
| output = parsedOutput.records; | |
| } else { | |
| output = [parsedOutput]; | |
| } | |
| function parseResponseData(responseBody) { | |
| try { | |
| const parsed = JSON.parse(responseBody); | |
| if (Array.isArray(parsed)) { | |
| return parsed; | |
| } else if (parsed.records && Array.isArray(parsed.records)) { | |
| return parsed.records; | |
| } | |
| return [parsed]; | |
| } catch (e) { | |
| console.error("Error parsing response:", e); | |
| return [{ response: responseBody }]; | |
| } | |
| } | |
| // Usage | |
| output = parseResponseData(actionResponse.body); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- app/client/src/pages/Editor/QueryEditor/QueryDebuggerTabs.tsx (1 hunks)
Additional context used
Biome
app/client/src/pages/Editor/QueryEditor/QueryDebuggerTabs.tsx
[error] 145-145: Avoid redundant double-negation. (lint/complexity/noExtraBooleanCast)
It is not necessary to use double-negation when a value will already be coerced to a boolean.
Unsafe fix: Remove redundant double-negation
Additional comments not posted (1)
app/client/src/pages/Editor/QueryEditor/QueryDebuggerTabs.tsx (1)
Line range hint
145-145: Remove redundant double-negation.The use of double-negation (
!!) in the condition!!responseDisplayFormat?.titleis unnecessary sincetitleis likely always a string and thus truthy unless undefined. Simplifying this condition improves readability and reduces cognitive load.Consider simplifying the condition:
- if (responseDisplayFormat && !!responseDisplayFormat?.title && actionResponse && actionResponse.isExecutionSuccess && !showResponseOnFirstLoad) + if (responseDisplayFormat?.title && actionResponse?.isExecutionSuccess && !showResponseOnFirstLoad)
| if (typeof actionResponse.body === "object" && actionResponse.body !== null) { | ||
| if (Array.isArray(actionResponse.body)) { | ||
| output = actionResponse.body; | ||
| } else if ('records' in actionResponse.body && Array.isArray((actionResponse.body as any).records)) { | ||
| output = (actionResponse.body as any).records; | ||
| } else { | ||
| output = [actionResponse.body]; | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Refactor suggestion: Simplify and unify response handling logic.
The changes introduced to handle different types of actionResponse.body are a good step towards making the system more robust. However, as previously commented, this block still suffers from code duplication and could be clearer.
Considering the previous comments and the complexity of handling various data structures, it might be beneficial to centralize this logic into a single function. This would not only reduce duplication but also enhance maintainability and clarity.
Consider the following refactor:
function parseResponseData(responseBody) {
if (typeof responseBody === 'string') {
try {
return JSON.parse(responseBody);
} catch (e) {
return [{ response: responseBody }];
}
} else if (responseBody && typeof responseBody === 'object') {
if (Array.isArray(responseBody)) {
return responseBody;
} else if ('records' in responseBody && Array.isArray(responseBody.records)) {
return responseBody.records;
}
return [responseBody];
}
return [];
}
// Usage
output = parseResponseData(actionResponse.body);Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| if (typeof actionResponse.body === "object" && actionResponse.body !== null) { | |
| if (Array.isArray(actionResponse.body)) { | |
| output = actionResponse.body; | |
| } else if ('records' in actionResponse.body && Array.isArray((actionResponse.body as any).records)) { | |
| output = (actionResponse.body as any).records; | |
| } else { | |
| output = [actionResponse.body]; | |
| } | |
| } | |
| function parseResponseData(responseBody) { | |
| if (typeof responseBody === 'string') { | |
| try { | |
| return JSON.parse(responseBody); | |
| } catch (e) { | |
| return [{ response: responseBody }]; | |
| } | |
| } else if (responseBody && typeof responseBody === 'object') { | |
| if (Array.isArray(responseBody)) { | |
| return responseBody; | |
| } else if ('records' in responseBody && Array.isArray(responseBody.records)) { | |
| return responseBody.records; | |
| } | |
| return [responseBody]; | |
| } | |
| return []; | |
| } | |
| // Usage | |
| output = parseResponseData(actionResponse.body); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@Naveen-Goud Thank you for changes.
Please update the code as per coderabbit suggestion and do comment if the suggestion is invalid.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Seems like the humans are having a chat. I'll hop back into my burrow for now. If you need me again, just tag @coderabbitai in a new comment, and I'll come hopping out!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
app/client/src/pages/Editor/QueryEditor/QueryDebuggerTabs.tsx (2)
Line range hint
166-166: Optimization: Remove redundant double-negation.The use of double-negation in
!!responseDisplayFormat?.titleis unnecessary since the value will be coerced to a boolean anyway. This simplifies the expression and improves code clarity.- if (responseDisplayFormat && !!responseDisplayFormat?.title && actionResponse && actionResponse.isExecutionSuccess && !showResponseOnFirstLoad) + if (responseDisplayFormat?.title && actionResponse && actionResponse.isExecutionSuccess && !showResponseOnFirstLoad)Tools
Biome
[error] 69-73: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early. (lint/style/noUselessElse)
Unsafe fix: Omit the else clause.
[error] 71-73: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early. (lint/style/noUselessElse)
Line range hint
176-186: Approval with a note on error handling.The use of
parseResponseBodywithin theQueryDebuggerTabsfunction is appropriate. However, consider enhancing the error handling to provide more detailed logs or user feedback when JSON parsing fails. This would help in debugging and provide clearer error messages to the user.Consider adding more detailed error logging or user feedback mechanisms to improve the debugging experience.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- app/client/src/pages/Editor/QueryEditor/QueryDebuggerTabs.tsx (3 hunks)
Additional context used
Biome
app/client/src/pages/Editor/QueryEditor/QueryDebuggerTabs.tsx
[error] 69-73: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early. (lint/style/noUselessElse)
Unsafe fix: Omit the else clause.
[error] 71-73: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early. (lint/style/noUselessElse)
[error] 166-166: Avoid redundant double-negation. (lint/complexity/noExtraBooleanCast)
It is not necessary to use double-negation when a value will already be coerced to a boolean.
Unsafe fix: Remove redundant double-negation
| const parseResponseBody = (body: any): any[] => { | ||
| let parsedOutput: any; | ||
|
|
||
| if (typeof body === "string") { | ||
| try { | ||
| parsedOutput = JSON.parse(body); | ||
| } catch (e) { | ||
| return [{ response: body }]; | ||
| } | ||
| } else { | ||
| parsedOutput = body; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| if (Array.isArray(parsedOutput)) { | ||
| return parsedOutput; | ||
| } else if (parsedOutput.records && Array.isArray(parsedOutput.records)) { | ||
| return parsedOutput.records; | ||
| } else { | ||
| return [parsedOutput]; | ||
| } | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Refactor suggestion: Simplify JSON parsing and response handling.
The function parseResponseBody is intended to handle various data structures. However, the current implementation can be optimized by removing redundant else clauses as indicated by the static analysis. This will improve readability and reduce unnecessary nesting.
const parseResponseBody = (body: any): any[] => {
let parsedOutput: any;
if (typeof body === "string") {
try {
parsedOutput = JSON.parse(body);
} catch (e) {
return [{ response: body }];
}
} else {
parsedOutput = body;
}
if (Array.isArray(parsedOutput)) {
return parsedOutput;
} else if (parsedOutput.records && Array.isArray(parsedOutput.records)) {
return parsedOutput.records;
}
return [parsedOutput];
};Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const parseResponseBody = (body: any): any[] => { | |
| let parsedOutput: any; | |
| if (typeof body === "string") { | |
| try { | |
| parsedOutput = JSON.parse(body); | |
| } catch (e) { | |
| return [{ response: body }]; | |
| } | |
| } else { | |
| parsedOutput = body; | |
| } | |
| if (Array.isArray(parsedOutput)) { | |
| return parsedOutput; | |
| } else if (parsedOutput.records && Array.isArray(parsedOutput.records)) { | |
| return parsedOutput.records; | |
| } else { | |
| return [parsedOutput]; | |
| } | |
| }; | |
| const parseResponseBody = (body: any): any[] => { | |
| let parsedOutput: any; | |
| if (typeof body === "string") { | |
| try { | |
| parsedOutput = JSON.parse(body); | |
| } catch (e) { | |
| return [{ response: body }]; | |
| } | |
| } else { | |
| parsedOutput = body; | |
| } | |
| if (Array.isArray(parsedOutput)) { | |
| return parsedOutput; | |
| } | |
| if (parsedOutput.records && Array.isArray(parsedOutput.records)) { | |
| return parsedOutput.records; | |
| } | |
| return [parsedOutput]; | |
| }; |
Tools
Biome
[error] 69-73: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early. (lint/style/noUselessElse)
Unsafe fix: Omit the else clause.
[error] 71-73: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early. (lint/style/noUselessElse)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
app/client/src/pages/Editor/QueryEditor/QueryDebuggerTabs.tsx (1)
Line range hint
166-166: Optimize boolean expression.Avoid using double-negation (
!!) when the value will already be coerced to a boolean. This simplifies the expression and improves code readability.- if (!!responseDisplayFormat?.title && actionResponse && actionResponse.isExecutionSuccess && !showResponseOnFirstLoad) + if (responseDisplayFormat?.title && actionResponse && actionResponse.isExecutionSuccess && !showResponseOnFirstLoad)Tools
Biome
[error] 69-71: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early. (lint/style/noUselessElse)
Unsafe fix: Omit the else clause.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- app/client/src/pages/Editor/QueryEditor/QueryDebuggerTabs.tsx (3 hunks)
Additional context used
Biome
app/client/src/pages/Editor/QueryEditor/QueryDebuggerTabs.tsx
[error] 69-71: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early. (lint/style/noUselessElse)
Unsafe fix: Omit the else clause.
[error] 166-166: Avoid redundant double-negation. (lint/complexity/noExtraBooleanCast)
It is not necessary to use double-negation when a value will already be coerced to a boolean.
Unsafe fix: Remove redundant double-negation
Additional comments not posted (1)
app/client/src/pages/Editor/QueryEditor/QueryDebuggerTabs.tsx (1)
176-176: Verify response parsing logic.Ensure the
parseResponseBodyfunction is correctly handling the various types of responses expected from different data sources, particularly in light of the changes made to accommodate Airtable's data structure.Also applies to: 186-186
Verification successful
Verified response parsing logic.
The
parseResponseBodyfunction correctly handles various response types, including the specific data structure used by Airtable.
app/client/src/pages/Editor/QueryEditor/QueryDebuggerTabs.tsx: const parseResponseBody = (body: any): any[] => { ... }Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check the usage of `parseResponseBody` to ensure it handles various response types. # Test: Search for the function usage and verify it's correctly implemented. rg --type typescript $'parseResponseBody'Length of output: 75
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Locate the definition of `parseResponseBody` and check its implementation. # Locate the `parseResponseBody` function definition. ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern 'function parseResponseBody($_) { $$$ }' # Check the usage of `parseResponseBody` across the codebase. rg 'parseResponseBody'Length of output: 450
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract the implementation of `parseResponseBody` from the specified file. # Extract the `parseResponseBody` function implementation from `QueryDebuggerTabs.tsx`. sed -n '/const parseResponseBody/,/};/p' app/client/src/pages/Editor/QueryEditor/QueryDebuggerTabs.tsxLength of output: 570
| const parseResponseBody = (body: any): any[] => { | ||
| let parsedOutput: any; | ||
|
|
||
| if (typeof body === "string") { | ||
| try { | ||
| parsedOutput = JSON.parse(body); | ||
| } catch (e) { | ||
| return [{ response: body }]; | ||
| } | ||
| } else { | ||
| parsedOutput = body; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| if (Array.isArray(parsedOutput)) { | ||
| return parsedOutput; | ||
| } else if (parsedOutput.records && Array.isArray(parsedOutput.records)) { | ||
| return parsedOutput.records; | ||
| } | ||
| return [parsedOutput]; | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Refactor suggestion: Simplify JSON parsing and response handling.
The function parseResponseBody is intended to handle various data structures. However, the current implementation can be optimized by removing redundant else clauses as indicated by the static analysis. This will improve readability and reduce unnecessary nesting.
const parseResponseBody = (body: any): any[] => {
let parsedOutput: any;
if (typeof body === "string") {
try {
parsedOutput = JSON.parse(body);
} catch (e) {
return [{ response: body }];
}
} else {
parsedOutput = body;
}
if (Array.isArray(parsedOutput)) {
return parsedOutput;
} else if (parsedOutput.records && Array.isArray(parsedOutput.records)) {
return parsedOutput.records;
}
return [parsedOutput];
};Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const parseResponseBody = (body: any): any[] => { | |
| let parsedOutput: any; | |
| if (typeof body === "string") { | |
| try { | |
| parsedOutput = JSON.parse(body); | |
| } catch (e) { | |
| return [{ response: body }]; | |
| } | |
| } else { | |
| parsedOutput = body; | |
| } | |
| if (Array.isArray(parsedOutput)) { | |
| return parsedOutput; | |
| } else if (parsedOutput.records && Array.isArray(parsedOutput.records)) { | |
| return parsedOutput.records; | |
| } | |
| return [parsedOutput]; | |
| const parseResponseBody = (body: any): any[] => { | |
| let parsedOutput: any; | |
| if (typeof body === "string") { | |
| try { | |
| parsedOutput = JSON.parse(body); | |
| } catch (e) { | |
| return [{ response: body }]; | |
| } | |
| } else { | |
| parsedOutput = body; | |
| } | |
| if (Array.isArray(parsedOutput)) { | |
| return parsedOutput; | |
| } | |
| if (parsedOutput.records && Array.isArray(parsedOutput.records)) { | |
| return parsedOutput.records; | |
| } | |
| return [parsedOutput]; | |
| }; |
Tools
Biome
[error] 69-71: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early. (lint/style/noUselessElse)
Unsafe fix: Omit the else clause.
|
I have reviewed and addressed the comments received from CodeRabbit. To resolve the issues, I added a separate method to handle the response parsing, thereby avoiding code duplication. After making these changes, I cross-checked everything to ensure it works as expected. As a result, we can safely ignore the latest suggestion from CodeRabbit.ai. |
| @@ -68,9 +68,9 @@ const parseResponseBody = (body: any): any[] => { | |||
| return parsedOutput; | |||
| } else if (parsedOutput.records && Array.isArray(parsedOutput.records)) { | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
we can remove else from the line 69 also
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
app/client/src/pages/Editor/QueryEditor/QueryDebuggerTabs.tsx (1)
Line range hint
176-186: Remove redundant double-negation and simplify error handling.In the logic for handling the action response, there's an unnecessary double-negation which can be simplified. Additionally, consider adding more robust error handling for non-JSON strings.
if (actionResponse) { if (isString(actionResponse.body)) { try { output = parseResponseBody(actionResponse.body); } catch (e) { output = [{ response: actionResponse.body }]; } } else { output = parseResponseBody(actionResponse.body); } }
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- app/client/src/pages/Editor/QueryEditor/QueryDebuggerTabs.tsx (3 hunks)
Additional context used
Biome
app/client/src/pages/Editor/QueryEditor/QueryDebuggerTabs.tsx
[error] 166-166: Avoid redundant double-negation.
It is not necessary to use double-negation when a value will already be coerced to a boolean.
Unsafe fix: Remove redundant double-negation(lint/complexity/noExtraBooleanCast)
Additional comments not posted (1)
app/client/src/pages/Editor/QueryEditor/QueryDebuggerTabs.tsx (1)
54-74: Refactor suggestion: Simplify JSON parsing and response handling.The
parseResponseBodyfunction handles different data structures effectively. However, the implementation can be optimized by removing redundantelseclauses and improving readability.const parseResponseBody = (body: any): any[] => { let parsedOutput: any; if (typeof body === "string") { try { parsedOutput = JSON.parse(body); } catch (e) { return [{ response: body }]; } } else { parsedOutput = body; } if (Array.isArray(parsedOutput)) { return parsedOutput; } if (parsedOutput.records && Array.isArray(parsedOutput.records)) { return parsedOutput.records; } return [parsedOutput]; };[REFACTOR_SUGGESTIOn]
|
Hii @ajinkyakulkarni and @chandannkumar, Please review this PR? |
|
This PR has not seen activitiy for a while. It will be closed in 7 days unless further activity is detected. |
|
hii @rohan-arthur @Aishwarya-U-R @sumitsum , I hope you're well. I’m curious and excited to hear your thoughts on my pull request raised a while ago. Looking forward to your review! Thank you. |
|
This PR has not seen activitiy for a while. It will be closed in 7 days unless further activity is detected. |
|
hii @rohan-arthur @Aishwarya-U-R @sumitsum , I hope you're well. I’m curious and excited to hear your thoughts on my pull request raised a while ago. Looking forward to your review! Thank you. |
|
hii @rohan-arthur @Aishwarya-U-R @sumitsum , I excited to hear your thoughts on my pull request raised a while ago. Looking forward to your review! Thank you. |
|
hii @rohan-arthur @Aishwarya-U-R @sumitsum @Nikhil-Nandagopal @NilanshBansal , this Pr has been approved by reviewer. could please run the workflow to merge the changes.? Thank you. |
NilanshBansal
added
Integrations Pod General
NilanshBansal
assigned rishabhrathod01 and AmanAgarwal041 and unassigned rishabhrathod01
Description
-This is the PR to show the total count of records for airtable queries.
fixes: #15126
fixes: #21557
changes in PR
-Updated the file in frontend file QueryDebuggerTabs.tsx, to make the data that is coming from api into array of objects.
-Updated the Frontend code , as a solution where the updated code will
- will check if the response is array of objects or not
- if not , then it will convert into an array of objects.
difference between PostgreSQL and Airtabls:
The main difference between relational and non-relational databases lies in how they represent data. Relational databases, like PostgreSQL, typically return data as an array of objects. This format is straightforward, with each object representing a row from a database table. On the other hand, non-relational databases, such as Airtable, often return data in a more nested structure. For instance, Airtable's data might be returned as an object that contains an array of records, where each record is itself an object. This difference in data representation can lead to inconsistencies in how data is processed and displayed, especially when integrating with systems expecting a specific format. Understanding and handling these differences is crucial for seamless data integration and manipulation across different types of databases
@ajinkyakulkarni
Summary by CodeRabbit