Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: Closing modal in Split view, exits code mode #32119

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 27, 2024

Conversation

hetunandu
Copy link
Member

@hetunandu hetunandu commented Mar 27, 2024

Description

Avoids widget selection on modal close when widget selection is blocked.

Fixes #32118

Automation

/ok-to-test tags="@tag.IDE"

🔍 Cypress test results

Important

Workflow run: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/8453269683
Commit: a1c3fdbc4e21cdbb2627d4b1fe71bb427bfef291
Cypress dashboard url: Click here!
All cypress tests have passed 🎉🎉🎉

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Enhanced the modal overlay functionality to improve user interaction.
    • Optimized modal handling to ensure smoother user experience.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 27, 2024

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes involve refining modal behavior in a web application. Specifically, unnecessary widget selection actions are removed to streamline modal interactions. Additionally, a new check is introduced to prevent modal actions when widget selection is blocked, enhancing modal management and user experience.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
.../modalOverlay/ModalOverlayLayer.tsx Removed unnecessary widget selection actions
.../sagas/ModalSagas.ts Added check for widget selection block before modal actions

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Prevent modal from switching to UI mode when closed in Code mode (#32118)
Prevent modal actions when widget selection is blocked, enhancing modal management (#30653)
Ensure modals and widgets behave correctly on mobile and comply with accessibility standards (#30788) Changes do not directly address mobile device or accessibility compliance concerns.
Address performance issues for modals on low-end devices (#30788) Performance improvements for low-end devices are not covered by these changes.

Related issues

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit-tests for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

@github-actions github-actions bot added Bug Something isn't working IDE Navigation Issues/feature requests related to IDE navigation, and context switching Needs Triaging Needs attention from maintainers to triage IDE Pod Issues that new developers face while exploring the IDE labels Mar 27, 2024
@hetunandu hetunandu added the ok-to-test Required label for CI label Mar 27, 2024
@hetunandu hetunandu enabled auto-merge (squash) March 27, 2024 14:16
@hetunandu hetunandu merged commit fc9fd18 into release Mar 27, 2024
46 of 48 checks passed
@hetunandu hetunandu deleted the fix/Modal-closing-side-by-side branch March 27, 2024 14:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Bug Something isn't working IDE Navigation Issues/feature requests related to IDE navigation, and context switching IDE Pod Issues that new developers face while exploring the IDE Needs Triaging Needs attention from maintainers to triage ok-to-test Required label for CI
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Bug]: When closing a modal in Code mode it goes to UI mode
2 participants