-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11
feat(ADFA-2994): Increase minimum storage needed for install #987
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
dara-abijo-adfa
wants to merge
1
commit into
stage
Choose a base branch
from
ADFA-2994-increase-minimum-storage
base: stage
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🧩 Analysis chain
🏁 Script executed:
Repository: appdevforall/CodeOnTheGo
Length of output: 132
🏁 Script executed:
Repository: appdevforall/CodeOnTheGo
Length of output: 9661
🏁 Script executed:
Repository: appdevforall/CodeOnTheGo
Length of output: 3223
🏁 Script executed:
Repository: appdevforall/CodeOnTheGo
Length of output: 3096
🏁 Script executed:
Repository: appdevforall/CodeOnTheGo
Length of output: 769
🏁 Script executed:
Repository: appdevforall/CodeOnTheGo
Length of output: 367
🏁 Script executed:
Repository: appdevforall/CodeOnTheGo
Length of output: 136
🏁 Script executed:
Repository: appdevforall/CodeOnTheGo
Length of output: 3529
The getter should be protected by the mutex to ensure explicit thread-safety.
The computed property is correct and idiomatic. However, the thread-safety concern is valid:
FeatureFlags.isExperimentsEnabledreadsflags.experimentsEnabledwithout acquiring theMutex, while theinitialize()function safely updatesflagsusingmutex.withLock(). This creates an unprotected read path that could see stale or intermediate values during flag updates.While
Booleanfield access is atomic at the JVM level (mitigating practical risk), the code is not explicitly thread-safe by design. Either acquire the mutex in the getter or annotate theflagsfield with@Volatilefor clarity and correctness.🤖 Prompt for AI Agents