Skip to content

docs: update to Actor numbers across docs #1631

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 12, 2025
Merged

docs: update to Actor numbers across docs #1631

merged 2 commits into from
Jun 12, 2025

Conversation

TC-MO
Copy link
Contributor

@TC-MO TC-MO commented Jun 12, 2025

Update to prose where we mention hundreds or specific number which gets invalid quickly

@TC-MO TC-MO self-assigned this Jun 12, 2025
@TC-MO TC-MO added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation. adhoc Ad-hoc unplanned task added during the sprint. t-docs Issues owned by technical writing team. labels Jun 12, 2025
@TC-MO TC-MO changed the title update to Actor numbers across docs docs: update to Actor numbers across docs Jun 12, 2025
@TC-MO TC-MO marked this pull request as ready for review June 12, 2025 10:09
@apify-service-account
Copy link

Preview for this PR was built for commit 4096288 and is ready at https://pr-1631.preview.docs.apify.com!

Copy link
Member

@fnesveda fnesveda left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Save this PR so that you know where to change it to "tens of thousands" soon 🙂

@TC-MO TC-MO merged commit fe12d52 into master Jun 12, 2025
10 checks passed
@TC-MO TC-MO deleted the Actor-number-fix branch June 12, 2025 10:30
@TC-MO
Copy link
Contributor Author

TC-MO commented Jun 12, 2025

That is true :D

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
adhoc Ad-hoc unplanned task added during the sprint. documentation Improvements or additions to documentation. t-docs Issues owned by technical writing team.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants