Skip to content

Conversation

Tetracarbonylnickel
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link
Contributor

@M-R-Schaefer M-R-Schaefer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the update.
I've made some suggestions for changes one could consider.

@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ ensemble:
duration: <DURATION> # fs
n_inner: 100 # compiled innner steps
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should we increase n_inner to like 500 or 1000?

r_min: 0.5
name: bessel
n_basis: 16
r_max: 6.5
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

rmax 6.5 is rarely needed in my experience. Most of the time 5-6 is fine. I would suggest 5 as a default.

Comment on lines 95 to 98
emb_lr: 0.01
nn_lr: 0.01
scale_lr: 0.001
shift_lr: 0.05
shift_lr: 0.03
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would suggest to lower the lrs by a factor of 10 or so

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LRs this high are rarely stable

@Tetracarbonylnickel Tetracarbonylnickel merged commit 1782291 into main Nov 22, 2024
2 checks passed
@Tetracarbonylnickel Tetracarbonylnickel deleted the new_config branch November 22, 2024 14:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants