-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(Dashboard): Color inconsistency on refreshes and conflicts #27439
Merged
Merged
Changes from 6 commits
Commits
Show all changes
21 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
91f0d51
Merge branch 'master' of https://github.com/apache/superset into dieg…
geido 43fe162
Prefer less used colors
geido 51bf74f
Merge branch 'master' of https://github.com/apache/superset into dieg…
geido 6f89a9c
Update map on hidden tabs
geido 83cf930
Clean up
geido a3e7ae8
Apply same color to same label value
geido 7706426
Update tests
geido 664d799
Update e2e tests
geido 36795f2
Increase coverage
geido f7dc117
Merge branch 'master' of https://github.com/apache/superset into dieg…
geido fa0e830
Refactor: naming - centralize update [WIP]
geido 211bfc0
Merge branch 'master' of https://github.com/apache/superset into dieg…
geido eadc4c3
[WIP] Refactor saving logics
geido 2eed5e5
Merge
geido c81a55f
Clean up
geido 33e0c1d
Move utils outside dashboard
geido 12a9a39
Re-apply chart original scheme
geido 8bdbb2e
Fix coverage
geido 98e620b
Merge branch 'master' of https://github.com/apache/superset into dieg…
geido 3e6c6a5
Merge branch 'master' of https://github.com/apache/superset into dieg…
geido 636e9bd
Merge
geido File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We might technically need to get consensus on this. @michael-s-molina any problems getting consensus and doing this now, or should we wait until the 5.0 proposals open up?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think waiting for 5.0 would be a good idea as it allows an orderly evaluation of proposed deprecations. We just need to add a card to the board to remind us to submit the proposal.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@michael-s-molina @rusackas this feature flag introduced a regression, so I don't think it makes sense to discuss depreciation. I am keeping it here and not deleting it for now just because we don't have a breaking window open. Thoughts?