Skip to content

[SPARK-4600][GraphX]: org.apache.spark.graphx.VertexRDD.diff does not work #5015

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 10 commits into from

Conversation

brennonyork
Copy link

Turns out, per the convo on the JIRA, diff is acting exactly as should. It became a large misconception as I thought it meant set difference, when in fact it does not. To that extent I merely updated the diff documentation to, hopefully, better reflect its true intentions moving forward.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Mar 13, 2015

Test build #28569 has started for PR 5015 at commit 92288f7.

  • This patch merges cleanly.

@brennonyork
Copy link
Author

ok to test

@brennonyork
Copy link
Author

/cc @ankurdave

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Mar 13, 2015

Test build #28570 has started for PR 5015 at commit 1e1d1e5.

  • This patch merges cleanly.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Mar 13, 2015

Test build #28570 has finished for PR 5015 at commit 1e1d1e5.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Mar 13, 2015

Test build #28569 has finished for PR 5015 at commit 92288f7.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28569/
Test PASSed.

@brennonyork
Copy link
Author

/cc @srowen too as you this is a, seemingly trivial, doc change

@srowen
Copy link
Member

srowen commented Mar 13, 2015

LGTM, straightforward doc update.

@asfgit asfgit closed this in b943f5d Mar 13, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants