Skip to content

[SPARK-45767][CORE] Delete TimeStampedHashMap and its UT #43633

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed

Conversation

panbingkun
Copy link
Contributor

@panbingkun panbingkun commented Nov 2, 2023

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

The pr aims to delete TimeStampedHashMap and its UT.

Why are the changes needed?

During Pr #43578, we found that the class TimeStampedHashMap is no longer in use. Based on the suggestion, we have removed it. #43578 (comment)

Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

No.

How was this patch tested?

Pass GA.

Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?

No.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the CORE label Nov 2, 2023
@panbingkun
Copy link
Contributor Author

cc @LuciferYang @dongjoon-hyun

@panbingkun
Copy link
Contributor Author

The issue of appveyor is not related to this PR.
#43631

@LuciferYang
Copy link
Contributor

I think the description of the PR should be clearer, like when this class was introduced, why it is no longer used, instead of referencing a comments.

@panbingkun
Copy link
Contributor Author

I think the description of the PR should be clearer, like when this class was introduced, why it is no longer used, instead of referencing a comments.

Done.

Copy link
Contributor

@LuciferYang LuciferYang left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1, LGTM if test pass

Copy link
Member

@dongjoon-hyun dongjoon-hyun left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1, LGTM.

@LuciferYang
Copy link
Contributor

Merged into master for Spark 4.0. Thanks @panbingkun @dongjoon-hyun and @beliefer

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants