Skip to content

Please disregard this PR in favor of #3353 #3370

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

andrewor14
Copy link
Contributor

I accidentally closed the PR at #3353 and can't re-open it for some reason. The changes here are identical the the ones there. I'll merge this into master and 1.2 once the tests pass.

==== EDIT ====
I just found a way to re-open #3353 so PLEASE DISREGARD THIS PR!

Andrew Or added 3 commits November 18, 2014 17:46
Unfortunately we have to expose the config here to keep the
test duration reasonably low.
Conflicts:
	core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/collection/Spillable.scala
@andrewor14
Copy link
Contributor Author

Never mind I just found a way to re-open that PR. Please disregard this one!

@andrewor14 andrewor14 closed this Nov 19, 2014
@andrewor14 andrewor14 changed the title [SPARK-4480] Avoid many small spills in external data structures (again) [SPARK-4480] Please disregard this PR in favor of #3353 Nov 19, 2014
@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Nov 19, 2014

Test build #23620 has started for PR 3370 at commit 27d6966.

  • This patch merges cleanly.

@andrewor14 andrewor14 changed the title [SPARK-4480] Please disregard this PR in favor of #3353 Please disregard this PR in favor of #3353 Nov 19, 2014
@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Nov 19, 2014

Test build #23620 has finished for PR 3370 at commit 27d6966.

  • This patch fails MiMa tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23620/
Test FAILed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants