-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 28.6k
[WIP][SPARK-29250][BUILD][test-hadoop3.2][test-maven] Upgrade to Hadoop 3.2.1 #25932
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
FYI, we already have the following in
NOTICE-binary
. We may need to remove the wordoptionally
, or to exclude these two like before.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@srowen . Could you give me some advice?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There are a few parts here. First, that NOTICE statement is from Hadoop's NOTICE, so I'd copy whatever it says now, to update.
Second, if it's a first-class dependency now, it needs to have a line in LICENSE-binary and a copy of the license in licenses-binary/. It's MIT-licensed so should be OK.
Finally, BC is a special case because it's subject to crypto export laws. We will have to update http://www.apache.org/licenses/exports/ to say that it's again a dependency in 3.0. I can go figure that out again as and when this is merged.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oops. It sounds too much for me. Please help me after I merge this. 😄
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For the record, the process for the last part is https://www.apache.org/dev/crypto.html#sources
I can do it afterwards, it's not hard.
However, hm, I wonder if Hadoop needs a similar disclosure at http://www.apache.org/licenses/exports/ ? It's possible that somehow it isn't distributed directly by Hadoop, but would be surprised if it's a first-class dep and it makes binary releases.
Maybe, eh, CC @steveloughran in case he knows anything about this angle.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ooh, it is in the binary isn't it
let me chase this up
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you, @srowen and @steveloughran .
I will use this chance to learn this legal process. :)