Skip to content

[SPARK-1342] Scala 2.10.4 #259

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

markhamstra
Copy link
Contributor

Just a Scala version increment

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Merged build triggered. One or more automated tests failed

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Merged build started. One or more automated tests failed

@pwendell
Copy link
Contributor

Maybe this needs to touch project/plugins.sbt also?

@markhamstra
Copy link
Contributor Author

My build didn't need that just to succeed, so I'm not sure what Jenkins problem is, but you're right that updating the plugins is a good idea.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Merged build triggered. One or more automated tests failed

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Merged build started. One or more automated tests failed

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Merged build finished. All automated tests passed.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

All automated tests passed.
Refer to this link for build results: https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/13530/

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Merged build finished. One or more automated tests failed

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

One or more automated tests failed
Refer to this link for build results: https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/13531/

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Merged build triggered. Build is starting -or- tests failed to complete.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Merged build started. Build is starting -or- tests failed to complete.

@markhamstra
Copy link
Contributor Author

That should be all of them now, but there is a 2.10.3-specific comment in the root pom.xml that could use some investigation @srowen

     <dependency>
        <groupId>org.slf4j</groupId>
        <artifactId>jcl-over-slf4j</artifactId>
        <version>${slf4j.version}</version>
        <!-- <scope>runtime</scope> --> <!-- more correct, but scalac 2.10.3 doesn't like it -->
      </dependency>

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Merged build finished. All automated tests passed.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

All automated tests passed.
Refer to this link for build results: https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/13552/

@mateiz
Copy link
Contributor

mateiz commented Apr 2, 2014

Thanks Mark, merged this.

@asfgit asfgit closed this in 764353d Apr 2, 2014
@markhamstra markhamstra deleted the scala-2.10.4 branch April 14, 2014 18:30
pdeyhim pushed a commit to pdeyhim/spark-1 that referenced this pull request Jun 25, 2014
Just a Scala version increment

Author: Mark Hamstra <markhamstra@gmail.com>

Closes apache#259 from markhamstra/scala-2.10.4 and squashes the following commits:

fbec547 [Mark Hamstra] [SPARK-1342] Bumped Scala version to 2.10.4
liancheng pushed a commit to liancheng/spark that referenced this pull request Mar 17, 2017
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Turns out that this was deterministically failing on bazel since the CWD includes "/.cache". The fix is to filter out all *.crc files instead of just those with "." in their name.

## How was this patch tested?

Unit tests.

Author: Eric Liang <ekl@databricks.com>

Closes apache#259 from ericl/debug-flaky-test-21.
foxish pushed a commit to lins05/spark that referenced this pull request May 3, 2017
erikerlandson added a commit to erikerlandson/spark that referenced this pull request Jul 28, 2017
Igosuki pushed a commit to Adikteev/spark that referenced this pull request Jul 31, 2018
bzhaoopenstack pushed a commit to bzhaoopenstack/spark that referenced this pull request Sep 11, 2019
arjunshroff pushed a commit to arjunshroff/spark that referenced this pull request Nov 24, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants