Skip to content

[SQL][DOCS] Improve table caching section #2434

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

[SQL][DOCS] Improve table caching section #2434

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

marmbrus
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Sep 17, 2014

QA tests have started for PR 2434 at commit 67215be.

  • This patch merges cleanly.

asfgit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 17, 2014
@marmbrus
[SQL][DOCS] Improve table caching section
85e7c52 
Author: Michael Armbrust <michael@databricks.com>

Closes #2434 from marmbrus/patch-1 and squashes the following commits:

67215be [Michael Armbrust] [SQL][DOCS] Improve table caching section

(cherry picked from commit cbf983b)
Signed-off-by: Michael Armbrust <michael@databricks.com>
@asfgit asfgit closed this in cbf983b Sep 17, 2014
@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Sep 17, 2014

QA tests have finished for PR 2434 at commit 67215be.

  • This patch passes unit tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

markhamstra pushed a commit to markhamstra/spark that referenced this pull request Sep 19, 2014
@marmbrus @markhamstra
[SQL][DOCS] Improve table caching section
0ab4fb0 
Author: Michael Armbrust <michael@databricks.com>

Closes apache#2434 from marmbrus/patch-1 and squashes the following commits:

67215be [Michael Armbrust] [SQL][DOCS] Improve table caching section

(cherry picked from commit cbf983b)
Signed-off-by: Michael Armbrust <michael@databricks.com>
@marmbrus marmbrus deleted the patch-1 branch September 22, 2014 19:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@marmbrus @SparkQA