Skip to content

[SPARK-3566] [BUILD] .gitignore and .rat-excludes should consider Windows cmd file and Emacs' backup files #2426

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

sarutak
Copy link
Member

@sarutak sarutak commented Sep 17, 2014

No description provided.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Sep 17, 2014

QA tests have started for PR 2426 at commit 6a0a5eb.

  • This patch merges cleanly.

@ScrapCodes
Copy link
Member

You can have global gitignore. https://help.github.com/articles/ignoring-files. I am not sure how many editors and such we are going to support. Mind closing this PR.

@sarutak
Copy link
Member Author

sarutak commented Sep 17, 2014

@ScrapCodes Thanks for your comment.
Vim/vi and Emacs are the most popular editors and current .gitignore considers vim's swp file so Emacs should be considered.

Also, this PR includes the modification for Windows batch file so I cannot close this PR, sorry.

@ScrapCodes
Copy link
Member

There is nothing like spark-env.cmd in the code base ? + Emacs is my editor of choice too and I add those excludes in gitignore global simply because I can not go and update gitignore on every open source project I work on.

@sarutak
Copy link
Member Author

sarutak commented Sep 17, 2014

Current code base doesn't include spark-env.sh but user can create and used by spark-class2.cmd, run-examples2.cmd, compute-classpath.cmd and pyspark2.cmd.

And if applying your logic, the entry for swp should be removed from .gitignore.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Sep 17, 2014

Tests timed out after a configured wait of 120m.

@sarutak
Copy link
Member Author

sarutak commented Sep 17, 2014

retest this please.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Sep 17, 2014

QA tests have started for PR 2426 at commit 6a0a5eb.

  • This patch merges cleanly.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Sep 17, 2014

QA tests have finished for PR 2426 at commit 6a0a5eb.

  • This patch passes unit tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds the following public classes (experimental):
    • class ArrayConstructor extends net.razorvine.pickle.objects.ArrayConstructor
    • class NonASCIICharacterChecker extends ScalariformChecker
    • class RatingDeserializer(FramedSerializer):
    • class SCCallSiteSync(object):
    • class Encoder[T <: NativeType](columnType: NativeColumnType[T]) extends compression.Encoder[T]
    • class Encoder[T <: NativeType](columnType: NativeColumnType[T]) extends compression.Encoder[T]
    • class Encoder[T <: NativeType](columnType: NativeColumnType[T]) extends compression.Encoder[T]
    • class Encoder extends compression.Encoder[IntegerType.type]
    • class Decoder(buffer: ByteBuffer, columnType: NativeColumnType[IntegerType.type])
    • class Encoder extends compression.Encoder[LongType.type]
    • class Decoder(buffer: ByteBuffer, columnType: NativeColumnType[LongType.type])

@sarutak sarutak changed the title [SPARK-3566] [BUILD] .gitignore and .rat-excludes should consider cmd file and Emacs' backup files [SPARK-3566] [BUILD] .gitignore and .rat-excludes should consider Windows cmd file and Emacs' backup files Sep 18, 2014
@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Sep 18, 2014

QA tests have started for PR 2426 at commit a306020.

  • This patch merges cleanly.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Sep 18, 2014

QA tests have finished for PR 2426 at commit a306020.

  • This patch passes unit tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@pwendell
Copy link
Contributor

This seems fine to me. For very common file editors seems okay to support them.

@asfgit asfgit closed this in 6cab838 Sep 18, 2014
@sarutak sarutak deleted the emacs-metafiles-ignore branch April 11, 2015 05:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants