-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 28.6k
[SPARK-26343][KUBERNETES] Try to speed up running local k8s integration tests #23380
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
holdenk
wants to merge
7
commits into
apache:master
from
holdenk:SPARK-26343-Speed-up-running-the-kubernetes-integration-tests-locally
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
6d7b2fd
Speed up running the kubernetes integration tests locally by allowing…
holdenk d366efc
Merge branch 'master' into SPARK-26343-Speed-up-running-the-kubernete…
holdenk af7e236
Use the spark.test.home property suggested by vanzin
holdenk c131a7a
Run from spark locally and build image if no image tag or tgz is spec…
holdenk 78f6ee4
I _think_ we are currently depending on soft failure because of R pac…
holdenk 475744b
Merge branch 'master' into SPARK-26343-Speed-up-running-the-kubernete…
holdenk fbb5471
Turn -e mode on and also disable trrying to build the R image since i…
holdenk File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this is too strict. You should be able to build images from the build directory too.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So @vanzin is the idea that if neither a SPARK_TGZ or an IMAGE_TAG is specified we'd dynamically build the image on request? Or what do you mean?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That would be my expectation.
Having to build a tgz before running the ITs slows down the process. So does manually having to build the images before running the ITs.
If invoking the ITs means "I'll test whatever version of Spark is currently built in your build directory", it speeds up everything.
(Kinda what running the ITs through sbt does.)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sounds reasonable, I'll switch that over.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We still want to special case this option I think, but it now runs successfully without an image tag or an release tgz specified. cc @vanzin