Skip to content

Fix typo in decision tree docs #1837

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Fix typo in decision tree docs #1837

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

emef
Copy link
Contributor

@emef emef commented Aug 7, 2014

Candidate splits were inconsistent with the example.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

@mengxr
Copy link
Contributor

mengxr commented Aug 19, 2014

LGTM. Merged into master and branch-1.1. Thanks for fixing the guide!!

asfgit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 19, 2014
Candidate splits were inconsistent with the example.

Author: Matt Forbes <matt@tellapart.com>

Closes #1837 from emef/tree-doc and squashes the following commits:

3be14a1 [Matt Forbes] Fix typo in decision tree docs

(cherry picked from commit cd0720c)
Signed-off-by: Xiangrui Meng <meng@databricks.com>
@asfgit asfgit closed this in cd0720c Aug 19, 2014
xiliu82 pushed a commit to xiliu82/spark that referenced this pull request Sep 4, 2014
Candidate splits were inconsistent with the example.

Author: Matt Forbes <matt@tellapart.com>

Closes apache#1837 from emef/tree-doc and squashes the following commits:

3be14a1 [Matt Forbes] Fix typo in decision tree docs
viirya pushed a commit to viirya/spark-1 that referenced this pull request Oct 19, 2023
We need to pull the artifact URL in order to publish an image based specifically on the published distribution.  The same build is shared across both snapshot and release image builds (i.e. YAML `release_image_build`).

This could be done at the end of the upstream job, but the distribution is architecture independent and a multi-arch image build would end up building multiple distributions.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants