[SPARK-18538] [SQL] [Backport-2.1] Fix Concurrent Table Fetching Using DataFrameReader JDBC APIs#16111
Closed
gatorsmile wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:branch-2.1from
Closed
[SPARK-18538] [SQL] [Backport-2.1] Fix Concurrent Table Fetching Using DataFrameReader JDBC APIs#16111gatorsmile wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:branch-2.1from
gatorsmile wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:branch-2.1from
Conversation
Contributor
|
LGTM, pending jenkins |
|
Test build #69518 has finished for PR 16111 at commit
|
Contributor
|
thanks, merging to 2.1! |
asfgit
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 2, 2016
…DataFrameReader JDBC APIs ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? #### This PR is to backport #15975 to Branch 2.1 --- The following two `DataFrameReader` JDBC APIs ignore the user-specified parameters of parallelism degree. ```Scala def jdbc( url: String, table: String, columnName: String, lowerBound: Long, upperBound: Long, numPartitions: Int, connectionProperties: Properties): DataFrame ``` ```Scala def jdbc( url: String, table: String, predicates: Array[String], connectionProperties: Properties): DataFrame ``` This PR is to fix the issues. To verify the behavior correctness, we improve the plan output of `EXPLAIN` command by adding `numPartitions` in the `JDBCRelation` node. Before the fix, ``` == Physical Plan == *Scan JDBCRelation(TEST.PEOPLE) [NAME#1896,THEID#1897] ReadSchema: struct<NAME:string,THEID:int> ``` After the fix, ``` == Physical Plan == *Scan JDBCRelation(TEST.PEOPLE) [numPartitions=3] [NAME#1896,THEID#1897] ReadSchema: struct<NAME:string,THEID:int> ``` ### How was this patch tested? Added the verification logics on all the test cases for JDBC concurrent fetching. Author: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com> Closes #16111 from gatorsmile/jdbcFix2.1.
Member
Author
|
Thanks! |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR is to backport #15975 to Branch 2.1
The following two
DataFrameReaderJDBC APIs ignore the user-specified parameters of parallelism degree.This PR is to fix the issues. To verify the behavior correctness, we improve the plan output of
EXPLAINcommand by addingnumPartitionsin theJDBCRelationnode.Before the fix,
After the fix,
How was this patch tested?
Added the verification logics on all the test cases for JDBC concurrent fetching.