Skip to content

Backport [SPARK-15062][SQL] fix list type infer serializer issue #15380

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

brkyvz
Copy link
Contributor

@brkyvz brkyvz commented Oct 6, 2016

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This backports 733cbaa
to Branch 1.6. It's a pretty simple patch, and would be nice to have for Spark 1.6.3.

How was this patch tested?

Unit tests

@brkyvz
Copy link
Contributor Author

brkyvz commented Oct 6, 2016

cc @marmbrus

@marmbrus
Copy link
Contributor

marmbrus commented Oct 6, 2016

LGTM

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Oct 6, 2016

Test build #66457 has finished for PR 15380 at commit f6a78fc.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@marmbrus
Copy link
Contributor

marmbrus commented Oct 6, 2016

Merged, can you close this?

asfgit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 6, 2016
This backports 733cbaa
to Branch 1.6. It's a pretty simple patch, and would be nice to have for Spark 1.6.3.

Unit tests

Author: Burak Yavuz <brkyvz@gmail.com>

Closes #15380 from brkyvz/bp-SPARK-15062.

Signed-off-by: Michael Armbrust <michael@databricks.com>
@brkyvz brkyvz closed this Oct 6, 2016
zzcclp pushed a commit to zzcclp/spark that referenced this pull request Oct 8, 2016
This backports apache@733cbaa
to Branch 1.6. It's a pretty simple patch, and would be nice to have for Spark 1.6.3.

Unit tests

Author: Burak Yavuz <brkyvz@gmail.com>

Closes apache#15380 from brkyvz/bp-SPARK-15062.

Signed-off-by: Michael Armbrust <michael@databricks.com>
(cherry picked from commit d3890de)
@brkyvz brkyvz deleted the bp-SPARK-15062 branch February 3, 2019 20:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants