[SPARK-16656] [SQL] Try to make CreateTableAsSelectSuite more stable #14289
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
test this please |
1 similar comment
|
test this please |
|
Test build #62636 has finished for PR 14289 at commit
|
|
Test build #62641 has finished for PR 14289 at commit
|
|
Test build #62646 has finished for PR 14289 at commit
|
|
Hopefully this can make the tests more stable by using different temp dirs for different tests. |
|
I am merging this PR to master and branch 2.0 |
asfgit
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 21, 2016
## What changes were proposed in this pull request? https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62593/testReport/junit/org.apache.spark.sql.sources/CreateTableAsSelectSuite/create_a_table__drop_it_and_create_another_one_with_the_same_name/ shows that `create a table, drop it and create another one with the same name` failed. But other runs were good. Seems it is a flaky test. This PR tries to make this test more stable. Author: Yin Huai <yhuai@databricks.com> Closes #14289 from yhuai/SPARK-16656. (cherry picked from commit 9abd99b) Signed-off-by: Yin Huai <yhuai@databricks.com>
asfgit
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 16, 2016
…ore stable ## What changes were proposed in this pull request? This PR backports #14289 to branch 1.6 https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62593/testReport/junit/org.apache.spark.sql.sources/CreateTableAsSelectSuite/create_a_table__drop_it_and_create_another_one_with_the_same_name/ shows that `create a table, drop it and create another one with the same name` failed. But other runs were good. Seems it is a flaky test. This PR tries to make this test more stable. Author: Yin Huai <yhuai@databricks.com> Closes #14668 from yhuai/SPARK-16656-branch1.6.
zzcclp
pushed a commit
to zzcclp/spark
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 17, 2016
…ore stable ## What changes were proposed in this pull request? This PR backports apache#14289 to branch 1.6 https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62593/testReport/junit/org.apache.spark.sql.sources/CreateTableAsSelectSuite/create_a_table__drop_it_and_create_another_one_with_the_same_name/ shows that `create a table, drop it and create another one with the same name` failed. But other runs were good. Seems it is a flaky test. This PR tries to make this test more stable. Author: Yin Huai <yhuai@databricks.com> Closes apache#14668 from yhuai/SPARK-16656-branch1.6. (cherry picked from commit 5c34029)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62593/testReport/junit/org.apache.spark.sql.sources/CreateTableAsSelectSuite/create_a_table__drop_it_and_create_another_one_with_the_same_name/ shows that
create a table, drop it and create another one with the same namefailed. But other runs were good. Seems it is a flaky test. This PR tries to make this test more stable.