Skip to content

[SPARK-16433][SQL]Improve StreamingQuery.explain when no data arrives #14100

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

[SPARK-16433][SQL]Improve StreamingQuery.explain when no data arrives #14100

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

zsxwing
Copy link
Member

@zsxwing zsxwing commented Jul 8, 2016

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Display No physical plan. Waiting for data. instead of N/A for StreamingQuery.explain when no data arrives because N/A doesn't provide meaningful information.

How was this patch tested?

Existing unit tests.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Jul 8, 2016

Test build #61945 has finished for PR 14100 at commit e00bc53.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@zsxwing
Copy link
Member Author

zsxwing commented Jul 8, 2016

cc @tdas

@tdas
Copy link
Contributor

tdas commented Jul 12, 2016

LGTM. Merging to master and 2.0. Thanks!

asfgit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 12, 2016
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Display `No physical plan. Waiting for data.` instead of `N/A`  for StreamingQuery.explain when no data arrives because `N/A` doesn't provide meaningful information.

## How was this patch tested?

Existing unit tests.

Author: Shixiong Zhu <shixiong@databricks.com>

Closes #14100 from zsxwing/SPARK-16433.

(cherry picked from commit 91a443b)
Signed-off-by: Tathagata Das <tathagata.das1565@gmail.com>
@asfgit asfgit closed this in 91a443b Jul 12, 2016
@zsxwing zsxwing deleted the SPARK-16433 branch July 12, 2016 05:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants