Skip to content

[SPARK-12884] Move classes to their own files for readability #10810

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

andrewor14
Copy link
Contributor

This is a small step in implementing SPARK-10620, which migrates TaskMetrics to accumulators. This patch is strictly a cleanup patch and introduces no change in functionality. It literally just moves classes to their own files to avoid having single monolithic ones that contain 10 different classes.

Parent PR: #10717

@andrewor14
Copy link
Contributor Author

retest this please

@rxin
Copy link
Contributor

rxin commented Jan 18, 2016

Can you create subtasks for SPARK-10620 for your individual patches?

@rxin
Copy link
Contributor

rxin commented Jan 18, 2016

(Assuming you didn't change anything, LGTM).

@JoshRosen
Copy link
Contributor

(Same conditional LGTM from me).

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Jan 18, 2016

Test build #49605 has finished for PR 10810 at commit 60f026f.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Jan 18, 2016

Test build #49609 has finished for PR 10810 at commit 60f026f.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@andrewor14 andrewor14 changed the title [SPARK-10620] Move classes to their own files for readability [SPARK-12884] Move classes to their own files for readability Jan 18, 2016
@rxin
Copy link
Contributor

rxin commented Jan 18, 2016

I've merged this.

@asfgit asfgit closed this in 302bb56 Jan 18, 2016
@andrewor14 andrewor14 deleted the move-things branch January 18, 2016 21:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants