-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 28.6k
[SPARK-12032] [SQL] Re-order inner joins to do join with conditions first #10073
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from all commits
18af774
1a32fea
3a62c32
babe395
70508f0
21a81b5
5469caf
556a382
eb31c37
ddffd8f
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -18,14 +18,12 @@ | |
package org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer | ||
|
||
import scala.collection.immutable.HashSet | ||
|
||
import org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.{CleanupAliases, EliminateSubQueries} | ||
import org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions._ | ||
import org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.aggregate._ | ||
import org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.plans.Inner | ||
import org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.plans.FullOuter | ||
import org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.plans.LeftOuter | ||
import org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.plans.RightOuter | ||
import org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.plans.LeftSemi | ||
import org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.planning.ExtractFiltersAndInnerJoins | ||
import org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.plans.{FullOuter, Inner, LeftOuter, LeftSemi, RightOuter} | ||
import org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.plans.logical._ | ||
import org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.rules._ | ||
import org.apache.spark.sql.types._ | ||
|
@@ -44,6 +42,7 @@ object DefaultOptimizer extends Optimizer { | |
// Operator push down | ||
SetOperationPushDown, | ||
SamplePushDown, | ||
ReorderJoin, | ||
PushPredicateThroughJoin, | ||
PushPredicateThroughProject, | ||
PushPredicateThroughGenerate, | ||
|
@@ -711,6 +710,53 @@ object PushPredicateThroughAggregate extends Rule[LogicalPlan] with PredicateHel | |
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
/** | ||
* Reorder the joins and push all the conditions into join, so that the bottom ones have at least | ||
* one condition. | ||
* | ||
* The order of joins will not be changed if all of them already have at least one condition. | ||
*/ | ||
object ReorderJoin extends Rule[LogicalPlan] with PredicateHelper { | ||
|
||
/** | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Remove this comment if it is the same as the object comment or augment this with more detail. Can you comment what the input arguments are? What is input? The least common ancestor of joins? Similar for conditions There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Updated |
||
* Join a list of plans together and push down the conditions into them. | ||
* | ||
* The joined plan are picked from left to right, prefer those has at least one join condition. | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Does this mean we generate a new identical tree each time this is run? Does this mess up the optimizer termination logic? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. The There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. This should be okay. We check reference equality first but then also check |
||
* | ||
* @param input a list of LogicalPlans to join. | ||
* @param conditions a list of condition for join. | ||
*/ | ||
def createOrderedJoin(input: Seq[LogicalPlan], conditions: Seq[Expression]): LogicalPlan = { | ||
assert(input.size >= 2) | ||
if (input.size == 2) { | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. We need a branch to terminate this recursive call anyway. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Ah sorry I missed it |
||
Join(input(0), input(1), Inner, conditions.reduceLeftOption(And)) | ||
} else { | ||
val left :: rest = input.toList | ||
// find out the first join that have at least one join condition | ||
val conditionalJoin = rest.find { plan => | ||
val refs = left.outputSet ++ plan.outputSet | ||
conditions.filterNot(canEvaluate(_, left)).filterNot(canEvaluate(_, plan)) | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. That's not right, the two reference could both came from left or right. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I see, thanks! |
||
.exists(_.references.subsetOf(refs)) | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. the implementation of
What if condition is So I think There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. No, in this case, the expression can not be evaluate by only There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. But why do we need to ensure the condition can only be evaluated by only There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. It's There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. ah i see, thanks for the explanation! |
||
} | ||
// pick the next one if no condition left | ||
val right = conditionalJoin.getOrElse(rest.head) | ||
|
||
val joinedRefs = left.outputSet ++ right.outputSet | ||
val (joinConditions, others) = conditions.partition(_.references.subsetOf(joinedRefs)) | ||
val joined = Join(left, right, Inner, joinConditions.reduceLeftOption(And)) | ||
|
||
// should not have reference to same logical plan | ||
createOrderedJoin(Seq(joined) ++ rest.filterNot(_ eq right), others) | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I think that this |
||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
def apply(plan: LogicalPlan): LogicalPlan = plan transform { | ||
case j @ ExtractFiltersAndInnerJoins(input, conditions) | ||
if input.size > 2 && conditions.nonEmpty => | ||
createOrderedJoin(input, conditions) | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
/** | ||
* Pushes down [[Filter]] operators where the `condition` can be | ||
* evaluated using only the attributes of the left or right side of a join. Other | ||
|
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -21,7 +21,6 @@ import org.apache.spark.Logging | |
import org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions._ | ||
import org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.plans._ | ||
import org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.plans.logical._ | ||
import org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNodeRef | ||
|
||
/** | ||
* A pattern that matches any number of project or filter operations on top of another relational | ||
|
@@ -132,6 +131,45 @@ object ExtractEquiJoinKeys extends Logging with PredicateHelper { | |
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
/** | ||
* A pattern that collects the filter and inner joins. | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Is it much more work to extract all the filters? For example if there is a filter after the inner join of input and plan 1. We'd ideally use this for predicate progation as well. For example select * from t1 join t2 on t1.key = t2.key and t1.key = 5. If we collected all the filters, this could be used to infer t2.key = 5 and push that down to t2. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Done |
||
* | ||
* Filter | ||
* | | ||
* inner Join | ||
* / \ ----> (Seq(plan0, plan1, plan2), conditions) | ||
* Filter plan2 | ||
* | | ||
* inner join | ||
* / \ | ||
* plan0 plan1 | ||
* | ||
* Note: This pattern currently only works for left-deep trees. | ||
*/ | ||
object ExtractFiltersAndInnerJoins extends PredicateHelper { | ||
|
||
// flatten all inner joins, which are next to each other | ||
def flattenJoin(plan: LogicalPlan): (Seq[LogicalPlan], Seq[Expression]) = plan match { | ||
case Join(left, right, Inner, cond) => | ||
val (plans, conditions) = flattenJoin(left) | ||
(plans ++ Seq(right), conditions ++ cond.toSeq) | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Should this be splitConjunctivePredicates(conditions) ++ cond.toSeq? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. conditions is already a list of Expression (splitted) |
||
|
||
case Filter(filterCondition, j @ Join(left, right, Inner, joinCondition)) => | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. maybe just |
||
val (plans, conditions) = flattenJoin(j) | ||
(plans, conditions ++ splitConjunctivePredicates(filterCondition)) | ||
|
||
case _ => (Seq(plan), Seq()) | ||
} | ||
|
||
def unapply(plan: LogicalPlan): Option[(Seq[LogicalPlan], Seq[Expression])] = plan match { | ||
case f @ Filter(filterCondition, j @ Join(_, _, Inner, _)) => | ||
Some(flattenJoin(f)) | ||
case j @ Join(_, _, Inner, _) => | ||
Some(flattenJoin(j)) | ||
case _ => None | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
/** | ||
* A pattern that collects all adjacent unions and returns their children as a Seq. | ||
*/ | ||
|
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,95 @@ | ||
/* | ||
* Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more | ||
* contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with | ||
* this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership. | ||
* The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0 | ||
* (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with | ||
* the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at | ||
* | ||
* http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 | ||
* | ||
* Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software | ||
* distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, | ||
* WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. | ||
* See the License for the specific language governing permissions and | ||
* limitations under the License. | ||
*/ | ||
|
||
package org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.optimizer | ||
|
||
import org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis | ||
import org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.EliminateSubQueries | ||
import org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.dsl.expressions._ | ||
import org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.dsl.plans._ | ||
import org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.Expression | ||
import org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.planning.ExtractFiltersAndInnerJoins | ||
import org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.plans.PlanTest | ||
import org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.plans.logical.{LocalRelation, LogicalPlan} | ||
import org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.rules.RuleExecutor | ||
|
||
|
||
class JoinOrderSuite extends PlanTest { | ||
|
||
object Optimize extends RuleExecutor[LogicalPlan] { | ||
val batches = | ||
Batch("Subqueries", Once, | ||
EliminateSubQueries) :: | ||
Batch("Filter Pushdown", Once, | ||
CombineFilters, | ||
PushPredicateThroughProject, | ||
BooleanSimplification, | ||
ReorderJoin, | ||
PushPredicateThroughJoin, | ||
PushPredicateThroughGenerate, | ||
PushPredicateThroughAggregate, | ||
ColumnPruning, | ||
ProjectCollapsing) :: Nil | ||
|
||
} | ||
|
||
val testRelation = LocalRelation('a.int, 'b.int, 'c.int) | ||
val testRelation1 = LocalRelation('d.int) | ||
|
||
test("extract filters and joins") { | ||
val x = testRelation.subquery('x) | ||
val y = testRelation1.subquery('y) | ||
val z = testRelation.subquery('z) | ||
|
||
def testExtract(plan: LogicalPlan, expected: Option[(Seq[LogicalPlan], Seq[Expression])]) { | ||
assert(ExtractFiltersAndInnerJoins.unapply(plan) === expected) | ||
} | ||
|
||
testExtract(x, None) | ||
testExtract(x.where("x.b".attr === 1), None) | ||
testExtract(x.join(y), Some(Seq(x, y), Seq())) | ||
testExtract(x.join(y, condition = Some("x.b".attr === "y.d".attr)), | ||
Some(Seq(x, y), Seq("x.b".attr === "y.d".attr))) | ||
testExtract(x.join(y).where("x.b".attr === "y.d".attr), | ||
Some(Seq(x, y), Seq("x.b".attr === "y.d".attr))) | ||
testExtract(x.join(y).join(z), Some(Seq(x, y, z), Seq())) | ||
testExtract(x.join(y).where("x.b".attr === "y.d".attr).join(z), | ||
Some(Seq(x, y, z), Seq("x.b".attr === "y.d".attr))) | ||
testExtract(x.join(y).join(x.join(z)), Some(Seq(x, y, x.join(z)), Seq())) | ||
testExtract(x.join(y).join(x.join(z)).where("x.b".attr === "y.d".attr), | ||
Some(Seq(x, y, x.join(z)), Seq("x.b".attr === "y.d".attr))) | ||
} | ||
|
||
test("reorder inner joins") { | ||
val x = testRelation.subquery('x) | ||
val y = testRelation1.subquery('y) | ||
val z = testRelation.subquery('z) | ||
|
||
val originalQuery = { | ||
x.join(y).join(z) | ||
.where(("x.b".attr === "z.b".attr) && ("y.d".attr === "z.a".attr)) | ||
} | ||
|
||
val optimized = Optimize.execute(originalQuery.analyze) | ||
val correctAnswer = | ||
x.join(z, condition = Some("x.b".attr === "z.b".attr)) | ||
.join(y, condition = Some("y.d".attr === "z.a".attr)) | ||
.analyze | ||
|
||
comparePlans(optimized, analysis.EliminateSubQueries(correctAnswer)) | ||
} | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you add to this comment what makes this rule stable? It's not obvious from reading the code.