[SPARK-49239] Add k8s-integration-tests GitHub Action CI job
#48
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
viirya
previously approved these changes
Aug 14, 2024
Member
Author
|
Could you review again, @viirya ? I added |
Member
Author
|
Thank you so much! Merged to main. |
dongjoon-hyun
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 7, 2025
…tead of `ToStringBuilder` ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? This PR aims to improve `SentinelResourceState.toString` by JEP-280 instead of `ToStringBuilder`. ### Why are the changes needed? This is aligned with Apache Spark main repository improvement. - apache/spark#51572 Since Java 9, `String Concatenation` has been handled better by default. | ID | DESCRIPTION | | - | - | | JEP-280 | [Indify String Concatenation](https://openjdk.org/jeps/280) | For example, `SentinelResourceState.toString` is changed like the following by this PR. **BEFORE** ``` public java.lang.String toString(); Code: 0: new #43 // class org/apache/commons/lang3/builder/ToStringBuilder 3: dup 4: aload_0 5: invokespecial #45 // Method org/apache/commons/lang3/builder/ToStringBuilder."<init>":(Ljava/lang/Object;)V 8: ldc #48 // String resource 10: aload_0 11: getfield #17 // Field resource:Lorg/apache/spark/k8s/operator/BaseResource; 14: invokevirtual #49 // Method org/apache/commons/lang3/builder/ToStringBuilder.append:(Ljava/lang/String;Ljava/lang/Object;)Lorg/apache/commons/lang3/builder/ToStringBuilder; 17: ldc #53 // String previousGeneration 19: aload_0 20: getfield #39 // Field previousGeneration:J 23: invokevirtual #54 // Method org/apache/commons/lang3/builder/ToStringBuilder.append:(Ljava/lang/String;J)Lorg/apache/commons/lang3/builder/ToStringBuilder; 26: ldc #57 // String isHealthy 28: aload_0 29: getfield #13 // Field isHealthy:Z 32: invokevirtual #58 // Method org/apache/commons/lang3/builder/ToStringBuilder.append:(Ljava/lang/String;Z)Lorg/apache/commons/lang3/builder/ToStringBuilder; 35: invokevirtual #61 // Method org/apache/commons/lang3/builder/ToStringBuilder.toString:()Ljava/lang/String; 38: areturn ``` **AFTER** ``` public java.lang.String toString(); Code: 0: aload_0 1: getfield #17 // Field resource:Lorg/apache/spark/k8s/operator/BaseResource; 4: invokestatic #43 // Method java/lang/String.valueOf:(Ljava/lang/Object;)Ljava/lang/String; 7: aload_0 8: getfield #39 // Field previousGeneration:J 11: aload_0 12: getfield #13 // Field isHealthy:Z 15: invokedynamic #49, 0 // InvokeDynamic #0:makeConcatWithConstants:(Ljava/lang/String;JZ)Ljava/lang/String; 20: areturn ``` ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? No. ### How was this patch tested? Pass the CIs. ### Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling? No. Closes #369 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-53818. Authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org> Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR aims to add
k8s-integration-testsGitHub Action CI job.Why are the changes needed?
To improve test coverage.
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No because this is an INFRA PR.
How was this patch tested?
Pass the CIs with newly added test CI job.
Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?
No.