Skip to content

Conversation

@boris-petrov
Copy link
Contributor

I'm not sure if I had to remove the PR template after I've read it and made sure I followed everything in it. Perhaps you might want to note that in it.

This continues the work done in #1407. I didn't think of that case in it so this PR fixes it. I didn't open a new issue for it, sorry, I guess we could reuse the old one as it's a similar case.

cc @lprimak

@lprimak lprimak requested review from bdemers, bmarwell and fpapon June 2, 2024 03:33
Copy link
Member

@bdemers bdemers left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This change looks good, but the test doesn't look like it's asserting that no session is being created? Can the test be improved (or commented if i'm reading it wrong)

@boris-petrov
Copy link
Contributor Author

@bdemers thanks for the feedback! The test is pretty much the same as the one above it - it doesn't do anything with the session on its own but the buildSubject call fails without the fix (as it calls save which tries creating a session). I could add a comment, sure.

Copy link
Member

@fpapon fpapon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@boris-petrov thanks for your contribution!

@lprimak lprimak merged commit f49e89f into apache:main Jun 3, 2024
@boris-petrov boris-petrov deleted the fix-creating-subjects-with-special-subject-factory branch June 3, 2024 21:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants