Fixed RPM / Deb / APK packages and enabled CI build#11
Merged
merlimat merged 6 commits intoapache:mainfrom Sep 30, 2022
Merged
Conversation
Comment on lines
-26
to
+25
| if [[ -z $BUILD_IMAGE ]]; then | ||
| # pull the image from DockerHub by default | ||
| docker pull $IMAGE_NAME | ||
| else | ||
| docker build --platform linux/amd64 -t $IMAGE_NAME $ROOT_DIR/pulsar-client-cpp/pkg/deb | ||
| fi | ||
| IMAGE_NAME=apachepulsar/pulsar-build:debian-9-2.11-x86_64 |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Back to the issue that has been discussed before, what's the process if I want to update the Dockerfile of the base image? How should I name the image?
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ideally, we should use unique image tags.
At this point the process would be to update the Dockerfile, build the image locally and push it to Dockerhub with the same tag. All the builds after that will sync and fetch the updated image.
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Got it. We should include this process when we added documents for the release process.
BewareMyPower
approved these changes
Sep 30, 2022
merlimat
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 30, 2023
#334) * Fix possible deadlock of Future when adding a listener after completed ### Motivation There is a case that deadlock could happen for a `Future`. Assume there is a `Promise` and its `Future`. 1. Call `Future::addListener` to add a listener that tries to acquire a user-provided mutex (`lock`). 2. Thread 1: Acquire `lock` first. 3. Thread 2: Call `Promise::setValue`, the listener will be triggered first before completed. Since `lock` is held by Thread 1, the listener will be blocked. 4. Thread 1: Call `Future::addListener`, since it detects the `InternalState::completed_` is true, it will call `get` to retrieve the result and value. Then, deadlock happens: - Thread 1 waits for `lock` is released, and then complete `InternalState::future_`. - Thread 2 holds `lock` but wait for `InternalState::future_` is completed. In a real world case, if we acquire a lock before `ProducerImpl::closeAsync`, then another thread call `setValue` in `ClientConnection::handleSuccess` and the callback of `createProducerAsync` tries to acquire the lock, `handleSuccess` will be blocked. Then in `closeAsync`, the current thread will be blocked in: ```c++ cnx->sendRequestWithId(Commands::newCloseProducer(producerId_, requestId), requestId) .addListener([self, callback](Result result, const ResponseData&) { callback(result); }); ``` The stacks: ``` Thread 1: #11 0x00007fab80da2173 in pulsar::InternalState<...>::complete (this=0x3d53e7a10, result=..., value=...) at lib/Futre.h:61 #13 pulsar::ClientConnection::handleSuccess (this=this@entry=0x2214bc000, success=...) at lib/ClientConnection.cc:1552 Thread 2: #8 get (result=..., this=0x3d53e7a10) at lib/Future.h:69 #9 pulsar::InternalState<...>::addListener (this=this@entry=0x3d53e7a10, listener=...) at lib/Future.h:51 #11 0x00007fab80e8dc4e in pulsar::ProducerImpl::closeAsync at lib/ProducerImpl.cc:794 ``` There are two points that make the deadlock: 1. We use `completed_` to represent if the future is completed. However, after it's true, the future might not be completed because the value is not set and the listeners are not completed. 2. If `addListener` is called after it's completed, we still push the listener to `listeners_` so that previous listeners could be executed before the new listener. This guarantee is unnecessarily strong. ### Modifications First, complete the future before calling the listeners. Then, use an enum to represent the status: - INITIAL: `complete` has not been called - COMPLETING: when the 1st time `complete` is called, the status will change from INITIAL to COMPLETING - COMPLETED: the future is completed. Besides, implementation of `Future` is simplified. #299 fixes a possible mutex crash by introducing the `std::future`. However, the root cause is the conditional variable is not used correctly: > Even if the shared variable is atomic, it must be modified while owning the mutex to correctly publish the modification to the waiting thread. See https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/thread/condition_variable The simplest way to fix #298 is just adding `lock.lock()` before `state->condition.notify_all();`. * Acquire lock again * Add initial value
2 tasks
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Motivation
Fixed RPM / Deb / APK packages and enabled CI build