Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Requirement
Polaris supports federating to Hadoop, Hive, and BigQuery metastore catalogs, but not to an
Iceberg JDBC catalog. Many organizations keep Iceberg metadata in a relational database (commonly
PostgreSQL) via Iceberg's JdbcCatalog. We would like Polaris to federate to such a catalog so the
database remains the source of truth for table metadata while Polaris brokers access, policies, and
multi-engine connectivity — consistent with the existing federation types.
Why
- JDBC/relational Iceberg catalogs are a common deployment; there is currently no way to bring them
under Polaris governance without migration.
- It rounds out the federation extension family (hadoop/hive/bigquery → +jdbc).
Out of scope (separate proposal)
- Sub-catalog (namespace/table-level) RBAC over federated JDBC catalogs.
Environment: Apache Polaris main; JDK 21.
Describe the solution you'd like
Proposed behavior (for discussion)
- A new
JDBC connection type and an optional polaris-extensions-federation-jdbc extension
(enabled with -PNonRESTCatalogs=JDBC), mirroring the existing federation extensions.
- A
PASSWORD connection authentication type (username + password), with the password offloaded to
the Polaris user secrets manager (never stored inline), plus support for IMPLICIT auth.
- Driver-agnostic: no bundled JDBC driver; drivers come from the deployment classpath.
Describe alternatives you've considered
- Migrate JDBC-catalog metadata into Polaris-managed Iceberg catalogs — rejected: requires a one-time migration and gives up the existing DB as source of truth, which defeats the point of federation.
- Front the JDBC catalog with an Iceberg REST catalog and use existing REST federation — viable for some, but adds an extra service to deploy/operate and doesn't help orgs that only run JdbcCatalog.
- Bundle common JDBC drivers in the extension — rejected in favor of sourcing drivers from the deployment classpath, to avoid license/version-pinning issues.
Additional context
I have a working implementation of this along the lines described and am happy to open a PR / discuss the design if there's interest. Related existing federation connection types: Hadoop, Hive, BigQuery.
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Requirement
Polaris supports federating to Hadoop, Hive, and BigQuery metastore catalogs, but not to an
Iceberg JDBC catalog. Many organizations keep Iceberg metadata in a relational database (commonly
PostgreSQL) via Iceberg's
JdbcCatalog. We would like Polaris to federate to such a catalog so thedatabase remains the source of truth for table metadata while Polaris brokers access, policies, and
multi-engine connectivity — consistent with the existing federation types.
Why
under Polaris governance without migration.
Out of scope (separate proposal)
Environment: Apache Polaris
main; JDK 21.Describe the solution you'd like
Proposed behavior (for discussion)
JDBCconnection type and an optionalpolaris-extensions-federation-jdbcextension(enabled with
-PNonRESTCatalogs=JDBC), mirroring the existing federation extensions.PASSWORDconnection authentication type (username + password), with the password offloaded tothe Polaris user secrets manager (never stored inline), plus support for
IMPLICITauth.Describe alternatives you've considered
Additional context
I have a working implementation of this along the lines described and am happy to open a PR / discuss the design if there's interest. Related existing federation connection types: Hadoop, Hive, BigQuery.