-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.5k
add @ManualAuthorization annotation for non-standard endpoints #9252
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
11 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
7bdcc84
add @ManualAuthorization annotation for non-standard endpoints
apucher 047309e
linter fix
apucher 0dd2f03
linter fix
apucher ffa8eec
annotation fix
apucher 78076b3
controller auth interface cleanup
apucher fd7ed79
endpoint url fixes
apucher 449ac69
remove AccessControlTest (see BasicAuthTest and UrlAuthRealtimeIntegr…
apucher e0fe9e7
retain hasDataAccess()
apucher 2df0ba3
use READ permissions for validation endpoints
apucher 890aa3c
switch null tableName in access control utils
apucher 8c1aa68
Merge branch 'master' into manual-authorization-annotation
apucher File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
36 changes: 36 additions & 0 deletions
36
...-controller/src/main/java/org/apache/pinot/controller/api/access/ManualAuthorization.java
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,36 @@ | ||
| /** | ||
| * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one | ||
| * or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file | ||
| * distributed with this work for additional information | ||
| * regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file | ||
| * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the | ||
| * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance | ||
| * with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at | ||
| * | ||
| * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 | ||
| * | ||
| * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, | ||
| * software distributed under the License is distributed on an | ||
| * "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY | ||
| * KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the | ||
| * specific language governing permissions and limitations | ||
| * under the License. | ||
| */ | ||
|
|
||
| package org.apache.pinot.controller.api.access; | ||
|
|
||
| import java.lang.annotation.ElementType; | ||
| import java.lang.annotation.Retention; | ||
| import java.lang.annotation.RetentionPolicy; | ||
| import java.lang.annotation.Target; | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| /** | ||
| * Annotation to be used on top of REST endpoints. Methods annotated with this annotation don't perform default | ||
| * authorization via AuthenticationFilter. This is useful when performing authorization manually via calls to | ||
| * {@code AuthenticationFiler.validatePermissions()} | ||
| */ | ||
| @Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME) | ||
| @Target(ElementType.METHOD) | ||
| public @interface ManualAuthorization { | ||
| } |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I believe we shouldn't make these nullable. The existing implementations might assume these are not null.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We already have scenarios where
nullis passed in here "by accident" iftableName(schemaName) happens to come out to null. This merely acknowledges that reality. Do you know of an existing implementation that has issues with this?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
+1. table name can already be null. also the access control doesn't distinguish between table or schema name