[test][multistage] enhance query plan test

[walterddr]

• optimized query physical plan to omit all mailbox
  • non-leaf will also get omit
  • multiple worker within a server will also get omit
  • all places with contextual info are now
    • printed as the following format: <PREFIX>[<FRAGMENT_ID>]@<HOSTNAME>:<PORT>|[<WORKER_ID>],
    • with multiple instances of the context, the format will be wrapped in { and } in a comma-separated list.

...
              └── [1]@localhost:1|[1] PROJECT
                  └── [1]@localhost:1|[1] JOIN
                      ├── [1]@localhost:1|[1] MAIL_RECEIVE(HASH_DISTRIBUTED)
                      │   ├── [2]@localhost:2|[2] MAIL_SEND(HASH_DISTRIBUTED)->{[1]@localhost:2|[2, 3],[1]@localhost:1|[0, 1]} (Subtree Omitted)
                      │   ├── [2]@localhost:2|[3] MAIL_SEND(HASH_DISTRIBUTED)->{[1]@localhost:2|[2, 3],[1]@localhost:1|[0, 1]} (Subtree Omitted)
...

• support other plan parsing in ResourceBasedQueryPlansTest
  • regex replace supported feature such as AS ..., ...ATTRIBUTES
  • WITH ... is not supported as we don't actually have corresponding processing on this variance yet.

This also addresses the verbose issue of subtree omit in #11272

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 61.29%. Comparing base (45f1869) to head (bd038c3).
⚠️ Report is 2996 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master   #11966      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     61.43%   61.29%   -0.15%     
- Complexity     1135     1141       +6     
============================================
  Files          2385     2385              
  Lines        129150   129149       -1     
  Branches      19994    19994              
============================================
- Hits          79347    79164     -183     
- Misses        44049    44237     +188     
+ Partials       5754     5748       -6     

Flag	Coverage Δ
custom-integration1	<0.01% <0.00%> (ø)
integration	<0.01% <0.00%> (ø)
integration1	<0.01% <0.00%> (ø)
integration2	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
java-11	27.60% <0.00%> (-33.78%)	⬇️
java-21	61.29% <100.00%> (-0.02%)	⬇️
skip-bytebuffers-false	61.27% <100.00%> (-0.14%)	⬇️
skip-bytebuffers-true	61.26% <100.00%> (-0.03%)	⬇️
temurin	61.29% <100.00%> (-0.15%)	⬇️
unittests	61.29% <100.00%> (-0.15%)	⬇️
unittests1	46.50% <100.00%> (-0.17%)	⬇️
unittests2	27.59% <0.00%> (-0.03%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.