This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 17, 2023. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.8k
[FEATURE] Include FlexiBLAS as available vendor. Find BLAS libs #21093
Open
ccoulombe
wants to merge
2
commits into
apache:master
Choose a base branch
from
ccoulombe:feature/add_flexiblas_support
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Would it make sense to set BLA_VENDOR to FlexiBLAS here? https://cmake.org/cmake/help/latest/module/FindBLAS.html#blas-lapack-vendors
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, as I do set it at CLI anyway.
It could be done for the others as well.
But I feel it is the same as setting the preferred BLAS with
BLAS=FlexiBLAS
. Unless you have in mind to refactor a bit so thatfind_package
is by itself unless one set a preferred BLAS?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For the other BLAS besides MKL this ChooseBlas.cmake does not rely on the upstream find_package(BLAS). My only concern is that with your PR, users can specify BLAS=FlexiBLAS, but your find_package(BLAS) will find any BLAS that may or may not be FlexiBLAS. That's why it will be helpful for you to force BLA_VENDOR=FlexiBLAS inside this if clause.
So, specifically I'm suggesting adding a
set(BLA_VENDOR FlexiBLAS)
before the current line but still inside the if clause.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Right! Just updated and bumped minimum cmake version to support BLA_VENDOR=Flexiblas.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you! How about keeping the CMakeLists.txt cmake_minimum_required as is and adding
cmake_minimum_required(VERSION 3.19)
beforeset(BLA_VENDOR FlexiBLAS)
inside the if clause? That would avoid unnecessarily breaking users on Ubuntu 20.04 LTSThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it is best to raise the minimum cmake version especially since there's a lot of nice to have and improvement in recent version. My opinion is : live in the present and look in front, not behind in terms of versions.
How would that break for users? (I mean except having to update their cmake version.)
Have two requirements in different places could be surprising.