Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Nov 17, 2023. It is now read-only.

Conversation

@kpuatamazon
Copy link
Contributor

Description

This is a twin of #19201 to fix #19197. I made a flaky test, sorry.

It's testing a quantizer that entails rounding but rounding 0.5 is ambiguous. So I intended to ban 0.5 by adding a small value. The code checks the interval (0.45, 0.55) and adds 0.05 to anything there. But that just shifts it to (0.5, 0.6) when I meant to go further from 0.5. Now it shifts to (0.65, 0.75) so 0.5 won't appear.

Checklist

Essentials

  • PR's title starts with a category (e.g. [BUGFIX], [MODEL], [TUTORIAL], [FEATURE], [DOC], etc)
  • Changes are complete (i.e. I finished coding on this PR)
  • All changes have test coverage
  • Code is well-documented

Changes

Fix flaky test test_contrib_intgemm_prepare_data

Comments

Another approach would be to allow some tolerance for quantized values around 0.5.

@mxnet-bot
Copy link

Hey @kpuatamazon , Thanks for submitting the PR
All tests are already queued to run once. If tests fail, you can trigger one or more tests again with the following commands:

  • To trigger all jobs: @mxnet-bot run ci [all]
  • To trigger specific jobs: @mxnet-bot run ci [job1, job2]

CI supported jobs: [clang, website, unix-cpu, sanity, unix-gpu, windows-cpu, edge, centos-gpu, miscellaneous, windows-gpu, centos-cpu]


Note:
Only following 3 categories can trigger CI :PR Author, MXNet Committer, Jenkins Admin.
All CI tests must pass before the PR can be merged.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[1.x] Test failure seen in recently introduced intgemm test

3 participants