-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 639
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Determine why Term is null in TestDocTermOrds when using SeekExact(0) #405
Comments
I suspect that 11323a5 might be where this problem began occurring. |
I'll do this one |
Great. I have assigned the issue to you. Thanks. |
It seems like the commit for this change got rolled back since it does not appear in the commit history for TestDocTermOrds. Is that a valid understanding? If so, is there any way in GitHub to actually confirm the commit was applied on date A but rolled back on date B? Or is there some other explanation for not seeing that commit in the commit history? (Sorry for these kinds of basic questions, I'm still working on better understanding GitHub ) |
I apologize, I should have specified that the change is from PR #381 that hasn't been merged to |
…ue in OrdWrappedTermsEnum class (fixes #405)
This change diverges from Java Lucene and shouldn't be necessary.
We run tests in
Release
mode withVerbose
set tofalse
, so in that case the problem is skipped. However, inDebug
mode the problem crops up. We need to investigate whyTerm
is sometimesnull
and formulate a fix.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: