[KYUUBI #6666][AUTHZ]Upgrade Ranger plugin to 2.5.0

[Madhukar525722]

🔍 Description

Issue References 🔗

This pull request fixes #6666

Describe Your Solution 🔧

Bump ranger version to 2.5.0
Release notes: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/RANGER/Apache+Ranger+2.5.0+-+Release+Notes

Types of changes 🔖

• Bugfix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

Test Plan 🧪

Behavior Without This Pull Request ⚰️

Behavior With This Pull Request 🎉

Related Unit Tests

---

Checklist 📝

• This patch was not authored or co-authored using Generative Tooling

Be nice. Be informative.

[yaooqinn]

Can we make the CI happy? Thank you @Madhukar525722

[Madhukar525722]

Sure, I will work. Spark tests are failing with

• check ranger policy file *** FAILED ***
  Line 24 is not expected. The file (/home/runner/work/kyuubi/kyuubi/extensions/spark/kyuubi-spark-authz/src/test/resources/sparkSql_hive_jenkins.json) is out of date. Please regenerate it by running dev/gen/gen_ranger_policy_json.sh. Expected " "[policyItems" : [ {]", but got " "[conditions" : [ ],]" (PolicyJsonFileGenerator.scala:79)

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 0.00%. Comparing base (7198c72) to head (88e1e12).
Report is 11 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@          Coverage Diff           @@
##           master   #6692   +/-   ##
======================================
  Coverage    0.00%   0.00%           
======================================
  Files         684     684           
  Lines       42237   42279   +42     
  Branches     5755    5765   +10     
======================================
- Misses      42237   42279   +42     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[Madhukar525722]

HI @yaooqinn , CI is smiling. Please review
cc @bowenliang123
After running the policy generator and updating the json. The test was failing due to order mismatch. Thats why I have used serialisation.

[pan3793]

Thanks, merged to master

[bowenliang123]

Late LGTM.