Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clean walnode after drop database when using simple consensus #13877

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Oct 23, 2024

Conversation

HTHou
Copy link
Contributor

@HTHou HTHou commented Oct 22, 2024

Description

As title.
The previous PR #13864 doesn't clean wal node when drop database.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 22, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 63.15789% with 7 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 39.85%. Comparing base (ce53f9c) to head (3fde3af).
Report is 3 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...db/db/storageengine/dataregion/wal/WALManager.java 0.00% 5 Missing ⚠️
...g/apache/iotdb/db/storageengine/StorageEngine.java 0.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master   #13877      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     39.83%   39.85%   +0.01%     
  Complexity       71       71              
============================================
  Files          4153     4153              
  Lines        262894   262916      +22     
  Branches      32013    32018       +5     
============================================
+ Hits         104725   104779      +54     
+ Misses       158169   158137      -32     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Oct 23, 2024

@jt2594838 jt2594838 merged commit 38f7219 into master Oct 23, 2024
29 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants