[#1464][FOLLOWUP] improvement(spark): print abnormal shuffle servers that blocks fail to send #1473
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…rvers that blocks fail to send
rickyma
force-pushed
the
issue-1464-followup
branch
from
9255c91
to
6060c21
Compare
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #1473 +/- ##
============================================
+ Coverage 54.01% 55.00% +0.98%
- Complexity 2776 2777 +1
============================================
Files 427 407 -20
Lines 24324 21963 -2361
Branches 2072 2072
============================================
- Hits 13139 12081 -1058
+ Misses 10368 9137 -1231
+ Partials 817 745 -72 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The output of failed shuffle servers' result has not been successfully deduplicated.
Why are the changes needed?
It's a followup PR for #1465.
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
How was this patch tested?
Existing UTs.