-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 206
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
refactor: recovery in standalone mode #414
Merged
ShiKaiWi
merged 4 commits into
apache:main
from
Rachelint:refactor-recovery-in-standalone
Dec 23, 2022
Merged
refactor: recovery in standalone mode #414
ShiKaiWi
merged 4 commits into
apache:main
from
Rachelint:refactor-recovery-in-standalone
Dec 23, 2022
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
chunshao90
reviewed
Nov 21, 2022
ShiKaiWi
reviewed
Dec 20, 2022
Rachelint
force-pushed
the
refactor-recovery-in-standalone
branch
from
December 22, 2022 05:34
20b44d8
to
8733961
Compare
Rachelint
force-pushed
the
refactor-recovery-in-standalone
branch
2 times, most recently
from
December 22, 2022 06:11
877e39e
to
740b946
Compare
Rachelint
force-pushed
the
refactor-recovery-in-standalone
branch
from
December 22, 2022 06:36
740b946
to
34ebf73
Compare
ShiKaiWi
approved these changes
Dec 23, 2022
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
ShiKaiWi
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 27, 2022
* refactor: separate object store from parquet sst async reader (#503) * refactor: separate object store from parquet sst async reader * fix errors in unit tests * use const FOOTER_LEN * add GenericResult * refactor: recovery in standalone mode (#414) * refactor recovery in standalone mode. * make getting table infos dynamically. * define `LocalTablesRecoverer`. * address CR. * feat: support parse key partition (#506) * add key partition parser * refactor the codes * add unit test * fix show create table for partition table * address CR issues * supplement the error msg when fail to parse partition key * fix unit tests Co-authored-by: CooooolFrog <zuliangwanghust@gmail.com> * chore: define remote_engine grpc service (#505) Co-authored-by: kamille <34352236+Rachelint@users.noreply.github.com> * feat: impl key partition rule (#507) * impl key partition rule(draft). * refactor to more extensible and testable version. * add tests for key partition. * add df adapter and partition rule's building. * address CR. Co-authored-by: WEI Xikai <ShiKaiWi@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: kamille <34352236+Rachelint@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: CooooolFrog <zuliangwanghust@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: chunshao.rcs <chunshao.rcs@antgroup.com>
chunshao90
pushed a commit
to chunshao90/ceresdb
that referenced
this pull request
May 15, 2023
* refactor recovery in standalone mode. * make getting table infos dynamically. * define `LocalTablesRecoverer`. * address CR.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Which issue does this PR close?
Closes #413
Rationale for this change
See #413
What changes are included in this PR?
VisitorImpl::visit_tables
to just collect the table infos.SchemaImpl::open_table
.Are there any user-facing changes?
None.
How does this change test
Test by exist ut.