Skip to content

Conversation

@skrawcz
Copy link
Contributor

@skrawcz skrawcz commented Dec 6, 2024

To help showcase Hamilton.

Changes

How I tested this

Notes

Checklist

  • PR has an informative and human-readable title (this will be pulled into the release notes)
  • Changes are limited to a single goal (no scope creep)
  • Code passed the pre-commit check & code is left cleaner/nicer than when first encountered.
  • Any change in functionality is tested
  • New functions are documented (with a description, list of inputs, and expected output)
  • Placeholder code is flagged / future TODOs are captured in comments
  • Project documentation has been updated if adding/changing functionality.

To help showcase Hamilton.
Copy link
Contributor

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 Looks good to me! Reviewed everything up to 2600621 in 1 minute and 20 seconds

More details
  • Looked at 198 lines of code in 4 files
  • Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 2 drafted comments based on config settings.
1. docs/make_testimonials.py:61
  • Draft comment:
    Consider saving the generated HTML to a file instead of printing it, to facilitate integration with the documentation build process.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Confidence changes required: 50%
    The Python script is used to generate HTML for testimonials, but it doesn't save the output to a file, which might be the intended use case.
2. docs/make_testimonials.py:59
  • Draft comment:
    Add comments to explain the purpose and usage of the code generating testimonials.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable:
    The code is simple and self-explanatory, especially given its context in the 'docs' directory. The comment does not point out a specific issue or improvement needed in the code itself. Adding comments for such straightforward code might not be necessary, as it doesn't seem extremely complicated.
    I might be underestimating the need for comments if the code is part of a larger, more complex system where understanding the purpose of each part is crucial.
    Given the simplicity of the code and its context, it is unlikely that additional comments would provide significant value. The code's purpose is clear from its structure and naming.
    The comment suggesting adding comments for code explanation is not necessary and should be removed, as the code is straightforward and self-explanatory.

Workflow ID: wflow_VpKvty88utHqLf66


You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

@skrawcz skrawcz merged commit 4e8dc43 into main Dec 6, 2024
22 of 24 checks passed
@skrawcz skrawcz deleted the add_testimonials branch December 6, 2024 21:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant