Skip to content

Conversation

stoty
Copy link
Contributor

@stoty stoty commented Sep 15, 2025

Description of PR

Accept the Thread.toString() output in Java 24 in the test

How was this patch tested?

Ran test with Java 8 and 24

For code changes:

  • Does the title or this PR starts with the corresponding JIRA issue id (e.g. 'HADOOP-17799. Your PR title ...')?
  • Object storage: have the integration tests been executed and the endpoint declared according to the connector-specific documentation?
  • If adding new dependencies to the code, are these dependencies licensed in a way that is compatible for inclusion under ASF 2.0?
  • If applicable, have you updated the LICENSE, LICENSE-binary, NOTICE-binary files?

@hadoop-yetus
Copy link

💔 -1 overall

Vote Subsystem Runtime Logfile Comment
+0 🆗 reexec 27m 20s Docker mode activated.
_ Prechecks _
+1 💚 dupname 0m 0s No case conflicting files found.
+0 🆗 codespell 0m 0s codespell was not available.
+0 🆗 detsecrets 0m 0s detect-secrets was not available.
+1 💚 @author 0m 0s The patch does not contain any @author tags.
+1 💚 test4tests 0m 0s The patch appears to include 1 new or modified test files.
_ trunk Compile Tests _
+1 💚 mvninstall 56m 52s trunk passed
+1 💚 compile 1m 32s trunk passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.27+6-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu120.04
+1 💚 compile 1m 18s trunk passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_452-8u452-gaus1-0ubuntu120.04-b09
+1 💚 checkstyle 1m 24s trunk passed
+1 💚 mvnsite 2m 9s trunk passed
+1 💚 javadoc 1m 20s trunk passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.27+6-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu120.04
+1 💚 javadoc 1m 44s trunk passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_452-8u452-gaus1-0ubuntu120.04-b09
+1 💚 spotbugs 4m 33s trunk passed
+1 💚 shadedclient 45m 9s branch has no errors when building and testing our client artifacts.
_ Patch Compile Tests _
+1 💚 mvninstall 1m 11s the patch passed
+1 💚 compile 1m 19s the patch passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.27+6-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu120.04
+1 💚 javac 1m 19s the patch passed
+1 💚 compile 1m 5s the patch passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_452-8u452-gaus1-0ubuntu120.04-b09
+1 💚 javac 1m 5s the patch passed
+1 💚 blanks 0m 0s The patch has no blanks issues.
+1 💚 checkstyle 0m 58s the patch passed
+1 💚 mvnsite 1m 15s the patch passed
+1 💚 javadoc 1m 2s the patch passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.27+6-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu120.04
+1 💚 javadoc 1m 30s the patch passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_452-8u452-gaus1-0ubuntu120.04-b09
+1 💚 spotbugs 3m 31s the patch passed
+1 💚 shadedclient 46m 26s patch has no errors when building and testing our client artifacts.
_ Other Tests _
-1 ❌ unit 310m 42s /patch-unit-hadoop-hdfs-project_hadoop-hdfs.txt hadoop-hdfs in the patch passed.
+1 💚 asflicense 1m 9s The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
510m 48s
Reason Tests
Failed junit tests hadoop.hdfs.server.blockmanagement.TestBlockTokenWithShortCircuitRead
Subsystem Report/Notes
Docker ClientAPI=1.51 ServerAPI=1.51 base: https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-7962/1/artifact/out/Dockerfile
GITHUB PR #7962
Optional Tests dupname asflicense compile javac javadoc mvninstall mvnsite unit shadedclient spotbugs checkstyle codespell detsecrets
uname Linux af8aa254afd5 5.15.0-143-generic #153-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 13 19:10:45 UTC 2025 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Build tool maven
Personality dev-support/bin/hadoop.sh
git revision trunk / 16def59
Default Java Private Build-1.8.0_452-8u452-gaus1-0ubuntu120.04-b09
Multi-JDK versions /usr/lib/jvm/java-11-openjdk-amd64:Ubuntu-11.0.27+6-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu120.04 /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64:Private Build-1.8.0_452-8u452-gaus1-0ubuntu120.04-b09
Test Results https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-7962/1/testReport/
Max. process+thread count 2373 (vs. ulimit of 5500)
modules C: hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs U: hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs
Console output https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-7962/1/console
versions git=2.25.1 maven=3.6.3 spotbugs=4.2.2
Powered by Apache Yetus 0.14.0 https://yetus.apache.org

This message was automatically generated.

@stoty
Copy link
Contributor Author

stoty commented Sep 16, 2025

PTAL @slfan1989 .

@slfan1989
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM.

@slfan1989
Copy link
Contributor

If there are no other comments, I will merge this PR as soon as possible.

@ayushtkn ayushtkn merged commit 97fe079 into apache:trunk Sep 27, 2025
1 of 4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants