Skip to content

Conversation

liubin101
Copy link
Contributor

Description of PR

Now if we use file configuration store, when failing over, if RM1 stopped and removed a queue that RM2 has in memory, failing over to RM2 will throw exception that queue cannot be deleted because the queue is not in stopped state.

Only using mutable configuration provider can skip validate queue hierarchy, I think file based configuration provider should also skip validate queue hierarchy when failing over.

How was this patch tested?

unit test

@hadoop-yetus
Copy link

🎊 +1 overall

Vote Subsystem Runtime Logfile Comment
+0 🆗 reexec 0m 20s Docker mode activated.
_ Prechecks _
+1 💚 dupname 0m 0s No case conflicting files found.
+0 🆗 codespell 0m 0s codespell was not available.
+0 🆗 detsecrets 0m 0s detect-secrets was not available.
+1 💚 @author 0m 0s The patch does not contain any @author tags.
+1 💚 test4tests 0m 0s The patch appears to include 1 new or modified test files.
_ trunk Compile Tests _
+1 💚 mvninstall 24m 39s trunk passed
+1 💚 compile 0m 31s trunk passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.27+6-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu120.04
+1 💚 compile 0m 31s trunk passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_452-8u452-gaus1-0ubuntu120.04-b09
+1 💚 checkstyle 0m 27s trunk passed
+1 💚 mvnsite 0m 29s trunk passed
+1 💚 javadoc 0m 35s trunk passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.27+6-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu120.04
+1 💚 javadoc 0m 27s trunk passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_452-8u452-gaus1-0ubuntu120.04-b09
+1 💚 spotbugs 1m 11s trunk passed
+1 💚 shadedclient 24m 47s branch has no errors when building and testing our client artifacts.
_ Patch Compile Tests _
+1 💚 mvninstall 0m 30s the patch passed
+1 💚 compile 0m 30s the patch passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.27+6-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu120.04
+1 💚 javac 0m 30s the patch passed
+1 💚 compile 0m 26s the patch passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_452-8u452-gaus1-0ubuntu120.04-b09
+1 💚 javac 0m 26s the patch passed
+1 💚 blanks 0m 0s The patch has no blanks issues.
+1 💚 checkstyle 0m 23s the patch passed
+1 💚 mvnsite 0m 28s the patch passed
+1 💚 javadoc 0m 24s the patch passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.27+6-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu120.04
+1 💚 javadoc 0m 24s the patch passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_452-8u452-gaus1-0ubuntu120.04-b09
+1 💚 spotbugs 1m 7s the patch passed
+1 💚 shadedclient 23m 59s patch has no errors when building and testing our client artifacts.
_ Other Tests _
+1 💚 unit 98m 20s hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager in the patch passed.
+1 💚 asflicense 0m 26s The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
181m 12s
Subsystem Report/Notes
Docker ClientAPI=1.51 ServerAPI=1.51 base: https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-7775/1/artifact/out/Dockerfile
GITHUB PR #7775
Optional Tests dupname asflicense compile javac javadoc mvninstall mvnsite unit shadedclient spotbugs checkstyle codespell detsecrets
uname Linux 4d86e1cbde2e 5.15.0-142-generic #152-Ubuntu SMP Mon May 19 10:54:31 UTC 2025 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Build tool maven
Personality dev-support/bin/hadoop.sh
git revision trunk / 43e4dc3
Default Java Private Build-1.8.0_452-8u452-gaus1-0ubuntu120.04-b09
Multi-JDK versions /usr/lib/jvm/java-11-openjdk-amd64:Ubuntu-11.0.27+6-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu120.04 /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64:Private Build-1.8.0_452-8u452-gaus1-0ubuntu120.04-b09
Test Results https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-7775/1/testReport/
Max. process+thread count 969 (vs. ulimit of 5500)
modules C: hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager U: hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager
Console output https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-7775/1/console
versions git=2.25.1 maven=3.6.3 spotbugs=4.2.2
Powered by Apache Yetus 0.14.0 https://yetus.apache.org

This message was automatically generated.

Copy link
Contributor

We're closing this stale PR because it has been open for 100 days with no activity. This isn't a judgement on the merit of the PR in any way. It's just a way of keeping the PR queue manageable.
If you feel like this was a mistake, or you would like to continue working on it, please feel free to re-open it and ask for a committer to remove the stale tag and review again.
Thanks all for your contribution.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Stale label Oct 10, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot closed this Oct 11, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants