-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9.1k
HADOOP-11452 make rename/3 public #743
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
steveloughran
wants to merge
8
commits into
apache:trunk
from
steveloughran:filesystem/HADOOP-11452-rename
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
c988daa
HADOOP-11452 make rename/3 public
steveloughran a78e472
HADOOP-11452 rename/3 has tests for local fs, raw local and hdfs.
steveloughran 943a751
HADOOP-11452 rename(path, path, options) to become public
steveloughran 78ce317
HADOOP-11452 trying to move rename/3 logic into its own class
steveloughran 83330ce
HADOOP-15183: S3AFileSystem does rename/3
steveloughran f4422a4
HADOOP-11452. Rename
steveloughran 535e28c
HADOOP-11452 Rename/3
steveloughran 2b9797c
HADOOP-11452 Rename/3
steveloughran File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You remove the deprecation here from the abstract FS. How will it affect the target release it can get in?
FS is
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Also it changed to
protected
topublic
. The same question applies.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
that's exactly the purpose: take a method which is protected and used only by FileContext, and make it public. It's been in for a while, been stable -and now needs tests and documentation of what it really does