HDFS-16930. Update the wrapper for fuse-dfs

[chaohengstudent]

Description of PR

update path with LIBHDFS_PATH
add path to LD_LIBRARY_PATH with compatible to java11
edit CLASSPATH

How was this patch tested?

manual test

root@6b76602de66c:/opt/hadoop# ./fuse_dfs_wrapper.sh -d hdfs://192.168.103.44:14370 /mnt/hdfs
INFO /home/chaoheng/hadoop/hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs-native-client/src/main/native/fuse-dfs/fuse_options.c:115 Ignoring option -d
INFO /home/chaoheng/hadoop/hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs-native-client/src/main/native/fuse-dfs/fuse_options.c:164 Adding FUSE arg /mnt/hdfs
FUSE library version: 2.9.9
nullpath_ok: 0
nopath: 0
utime_omit_ok: 0
unique: 2, opcode: INIT (26), nodeid: 0, insize: 104, pid: 0
INIT: 7.36
flags=0x73fffffb
max_readahead=0x00020000
INFO /home/chaoheng/hadoop/hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs-native-client/src/main/native/fuse-dfs/fuse_init.c:98 Mounting with options: [ protected=(NULL), nn_uri=hdfs://192.168.103.44:14370, nn_port=0, debug=0, read_only=0, initchecks=0, no_permissions=0, usetrash=0, entry_timeout=60, attribute_timeout=60, rdbuffer_size=10485760, direct_io=0 ]
fuseConnectInit: initialized with timer period 5, expiry period 300
   INIT: 7.19
   flags=0x00000039
   max_readahead=0x00020000
   max_write=0x00020000
   max_background=0
   congestion_threshold=0
   unique: 2, success, outsize: 40

For code changes:

• Does the title or this PR starts with the corresponding JIRA issue id (e.g. 'HADOOP-17799. Your PR title ...')?
• Object storage: have the integration tests been executed and the endpoint declared according to the connector-specific documentation?
• If adding new dependencies to the code, are these dependencies licensed in a way that is compatible for inclusion under ASF 2.0?
• If applicable, have you updated the LICENSE, LICENSE-binary, NOTICE-binary files?

[hadoop-yetus]

💔 -1 overall

Vote	Subsystem	Runtime	Logfile	Comment
+0 🆗	reexec	12m 53s		Docker mode activated.
			_ Prechecks _
+1 💚	dupname	0m 0s		No case conflicting files found.
+0 🆗	codespell	0m 0s		codespell was not available.
+0 🆗	detsecrets	0m 0s		detect-secrets was not available.
+0 🆗	shelldocs	0m 1s		Shelldocs was not available.
+1 💚	@author	0m 0s		The patch does not contain any @author tags.
-1 ❌	test4tests	0m 0s		The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch.
			_ trunk Compile Tests _
-1 ❌	mvninstall	37m 41s	/branch-mvninstall-root.txt	root in trunk failed.
+1 💚	mvnsite	0m 28s		trunk passed
+1 💚	shadedclient	19m 31s		branch has no errors when building and testing our client artifacts.
			_ Patch Compile Tests _
+1 💚	mvninstall	0m 15s		the patch passed
+1 💚	blanks	0m 0s		The patch has no blanks issues.
+1 💚	mvnsite	0m 17s		the patch passed
+1 💚	shellcheck	0m 0s		No new issues.
+1 💚	shadedclient	19m 1s		patch has no errors when building and testing our client artifacts.
			_ Other Tests _
+1 💚	unit	3m 38s		hadoop-hdfs-native-client in the patch passed.
+1 💚	asflicense	0m 39s		The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
		97m 29s

Subsystem	Report/Notes
Docker	ClientAPI=1.42 ServerAPI=1.42 base: https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-5449/1/artifact/out/Dockerfile
GITHUB PR	#5449
Optional Tests	dupname asflicense mvnsite unit codespell detsecrets shellcheck shelldocs
uname	Linux a0da5c06db93 4.15.0-200-generic #211-Ubuntu SMP Thu Nov 24 18:16:04 UTC 2022 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Build tool	maven
Personality	dev-support/bin/hadoop.sh
git revision	trunk / 6856251
Test Results	https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-5449/1/testReport/
Max. process+thread count	558 (vs. ulimit of 5500)
modules	C: hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs-native-client U: hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs-native-client
Console output	https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-5449/1/console
versions	git=2.25.1 maven=3.6.3 shellcheck=0.7.0
Powered by	Apache Yetus 0.14.0 https://yetus.apache.org

This message was automatically generated.

[jojochuang]

Thanks for the PR. Has this been tested on different machines, such as x86 Linux or Mac?

[jojochuang]

It's been a while but I don't think fuse-dfs relies on distcp jars

[lfrancke]

If some of these things are not clear then we can maybe split out the bits that can definitely be fixed.
e.g. the LIBHDFS_PATH fix.

I've stumbled across this as well tonight.