Skip to content

HADOOP-18560. AvroFSInput opens a stream twice and discards the second one without closing #5186

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

steveloughran
Copy link
Contributor

Description of PR

removes a needless line in AvroFSInput(final FileContext fc, final Path p which opens the path a second time and discards the result.

on input streams which immediately set up a connection with the store, this can leak connections.

Note, this is through the FileContext constructor, which is only used in production in org.apache.hadoop.fs.shell.Display, which being used from the command line, shouldn't be a long-lived process

How was this patch tested?

going to see what yetus says.

For code changes:

  • Does the title or this PR starts with the corresponding JIRA issue id (e.g. 'HADOOP-17799. Your PR title ...')?
  • Object storage: have the integration tests been executed and the endpoint declared according to the connector-specific documentation?
  • If adding new dependencies to the code, are these dependencies licensed in a way that is compatible for inclusion under ASF 2.0?
  • If applicable, have you updated the LICENSE, LICENSE-binary, NOTICE-binary files?

…d one without closing

Change-Id: Ide6b2deee21e38dff2d746e986653c3f5ecdc589
Copy link
Contributor

@cnauroth cnauroth left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1, pending CI run. @steveloughran , thank you for the fix.

@hadoop-yetus
Copy link

💔 -1 overall

Vote Subsystem Runtime Logfile Comment
+0 🆗 reexec 1m 24s Docker mode activated.
_ Prechecks _
+1 💚 dupname 0m 0s No case conflicting files found.
+0 🆗 codespell 0m 0s codespell was not available.
+0 🆗 detsecrets 0m 0s detect-secrets was not available.
+1 💚 @author 0m 0s The patch does not contain any @author tags.
-1 ❌ test4tests 0m 0s The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch.
_ trunk Compile Tests _
+1 💚 mvninstall 42m 55s trunk passed
+1 💚 compile 26m 17s trunk passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.16+8-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu120.04
+1 💚 compile 22m 53s trunk passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_342-8u342-b07-0ubuntu1~20.04-b07
+1 💚 checkstyle 1m 24s trunk passed
+1 💚 mvnsite 1m 54s trunk passed
+1 💚 javadoc 1m 26s trunk passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.16+8-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu120.04
+1 💚 javadoc 0m 58s trunk passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_342-8u342-b07-0ubuntu1~20.04-b07
+1 💚 spotbugs 3m 3s trunk passed
+1 💚 shadedclient 26m 17s branch has no errors when building and testing our client artifacts.
_ Patch Compile Tests _
+1 💚 mvninstall 1m 8s the patch passed
+1 💚 compile 25m 43s the patch passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.16+8-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu120.04
+1 💚 javac 25m 43s the patch passed
+1 💚 compile 22m 32s the patch passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_342-8u342-b07-0ubuntu1~20.04-b07
+1 💚 javac 22m 32s the patch passed
+1 💚 blanks 0m 0s The patch has no blanks issues.
+1 💚 checkstyle 1m 16s the patch passed
+1 💚 mvnsite 1m 51s the patch passed
+1 💚 javadoc 1m 17s the patch passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.16+8-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu120.04
+1 💚 javadoc 0m 55s the patch passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_342-8u342-b07-0ubuntu1~20.04-b07
+1 💚 spotbugs 3m 3s the patch passed
+1 💚 shadedclient 26m 26s patch has no errors when building and testing our client artifacts.
_ Other Tests _
+1 💚 unit 18m 47s hadoop-common in the patch passed.
+1 💚 asflicense 1m 10s The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
233m 12s
Subsystem Report/Notes
Docker ClientAPI=1.41 ServerAPI=1.41 base: https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-5186/1/artifact/out/Dockerfile
GITHUB PR #5186
Optional Tests dupname asflicense compile javac javadoc mvninstall mvnsite unit shadedclient spotbugs checkstyle codespell detsecrets
uname Linux 5b9b0ac842b5 4.15.0-191-generic #202-Ubuntu SMP Thu Aug 4 01:49:29 UTC 2022 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Build tool maven
Personality dev-support/bin/hadoop.sh
git revision trunk / 6b1bd2c
Default Java Private Build-1.8.0_342-8u342-b07-0ubuntu1~20.04-b07
Multi-JDK versions /usr/lib/jvm/java-11-openjdk-amd64:Ubuntu-11.0.16+8-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu120.04 /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64:Private Build-1.8.0_342-8u342-b07-0ubuntu1~20.04-b07
Test Results https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-5186/1/testReport/
Max. process+thread count 1246 (vs. ulimit of 5500)
modules C: hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common U: hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common
Console output https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-5186/1/console
versions git=2.25.1 maven=3.6.3 spotbugs=4.2.2
Powered by Apache Yetus 0.14.0 https://yetus.apache.org

This message was automatically generated.

@steveloughran
Copy link
Contributor Author

thanks chris. was my fault in the first place though -don't thank me too much

@steveloughran steveloughran merged commit b666075 into apache:trunk Dec 6, 2022
asfgit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 6, 2022
…d one without closing (#5186)

This is needed for branches with  the hadoop-common changes of
HADOOP-16202. Enhanced openFile()
asfgit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 6, 2022
…d one without closing (#5186)

This is needed for branches with  the hadoop-common changes of
HADOOP-16202. Enhanced openFile()
slfan1989 pushed a commit to slfan1989/hadoop that referenced this pull request Dec 20, 2022
…d one without closing (apache#5186)


This is needed for branches with  the hadoop-common changes of
HADOOP-16202. Enhanced openFile()
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants