-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9.1k
Hadoop 16524 - resubmission following some unit test fixes #2693
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
💔 -1 overall
This message was automatically generated. |
💔 -1 overall
This message was automatically generated. |
I see:
.... and a few other unrelated. |
💔 -1 overall
This message was automatically generated. |
💔 -1 overall
This message was automatically generated. |
Unrelated failure:
|
Build 5 had compilation error... from elsewhere? Checking local, all compiles now. Retrying... |
Thanks for retrying @saintstack . I did pull latest trunk to check for compilation errors locally and all went fine, must have been a temporary issue from elsewhere. |
💔 -1 overall
This message was automatically generated. |
Build #4 had these tests fail: Build #5 had compile issue. Build #6 failed w/ these issues: org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.TestRMRestart.testRMRestartOnMissingAttempts[FAIR] None seem related. Will run one more build to be sure. |
💔 -1 overall
This message was automatically generated. |
Failures this time through are the below, new failures.
Let me merge. Each build has new flakies fail. |
Signed-off-by: stack <stack@apache.org>
…pache#2693)" Revert to fix the summary message. This reverts commit 9509beb.
This is a follow up on this PR which was rejected due to some failed unit tests #2470 that were missed initially.
Most of the failures reported here appears to be flaky tests as they passed when run locally:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16524?focusedCommentId=17262765&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#comment-17262765
I've address the one test that was clearly broken by the PR and also including another unit test fix in the same vein.