Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Subtask] Add Java client support for fileset #1838

Closed
Tracked by #1241
coolderli opened this issue Feb 1, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #2039
Closed
Tracked by #1241

[Subtask] Add Java client support for fileset #1838

coolderli opened this issue Feb 1, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #2039
Assignees
Labels
subtask Subtasks of umbrella issue

Comments

@coolderli
Copy link
Collaborator

Describe the subtask

Add Java client support for fileset

Parent issue

#1241

@coolderli coolderli added the subtask Subtasks of umbrella issue label Feb 1, 2024
coolderli added a commit to coolderli/gravitino that referenced this issue Feb 1, 2024
coolderli added a commit to coolderli/gravitino that referenced this issue Feb 3, 2024
coolderli added a commit to coolderli/gravitino that referenced this issue Feb 4, 2024
coolderli added a commit to coolderli/gravitino that referenced this issue Feb 5, 2024
coolderli added a commit to coolderli/gravitino that referenced this issue Feb 18, 2024
coolderli added a commit to coolderli/gravitino that referenced this issue Feb 19, 2024
jerryshao pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 19, 2024
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Add Java client support for fileset

### Why are the changes needed?

Fix: #1838 

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
- Add Java client support for fileset

### How was this patch tested?

add ut. `com.datastrato.gravitino.client.TestFilesetCatalog`
@jerryshao jerryshao added this to the Gravitino 0.5.0 milestone Feb 19, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
subtask Subtasks of umbrella issue
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants