Skip to content

branch-4.0: [Test](client) Add s3 storage client test sketelon #57456 #58164

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 24, 2025
Merged

branch-4.0: [Test](client) Add s3 storage client test sketelon #57456 #58164

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 24, 2025

Conversation

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions bot commented Nov 20, 2025

Cherry-picked from #57456

@wyxxxcat
[Test](client) Add s3 storage client test sketelon (#57456)
1280362 
### What problem does this PR solve?

If you want to run unit tests using a real cloud provider, you can
configure it in `custom_env.sh`.
```
# Enable S3 client for unit tests
export ENABLE_S3_CLIENT=1
# S3 client config
export S3_AK="xxx"
export S3_SK="xxx"
export S3_ENDPOINT="xxx"
export S3_PROVIDER="xxx"
export S3_BUCKET="xxx"
export S3_REGION="xxx"
export S3_PREFIX=""
```
@github-actions github-actions bot requested a review from yiguolei as a code owner November 20, 2025 02:25
@hello-stephen
Copy link
Contributor

hello-stephen commented Nov 20, 2025

Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris.
Don't know what should be done next? See How to process your PR.

Please clearly describe your PR:

  1. What problem was fixed (it's best to include specific error reporting information). How it was fixed.
  2. Which behaviors were modified. What was the previous behavior, what is it now, why was it modified, and what possible impacts might there be.
  3. What features were added. Why was this function added?
  4. Which code was refactored and why was this part of the code refactored?
  5. Which functions were optimized and what is the difference before and after the optimization?

@hello-stephen
Copy link
Contributor

hello-stephen commented Nov 20, 2025

run buildall

@doris-robot
Copy link

doris-robot commented Nov 20, 2025

BE UT Coverage Report

Increment line coverage 0.00% (0/5) 🎉

Increment coverage report
Complete coverage report

Category Coverage
Function Coverage 52.74% (18163/34439)
Line Coverage 38.11% (165404/434058)
Region Coverage 33.15% (128509/387658)
Branch Coverage 33.96% (55413/163190)

@yiguolei yiguolei closed this Nov 24, 2025
@yiguolei yiguolei reopened this Nov 24, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by one committer. label Nov 24, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor Author

github-actions bot commented Nov 24, 2025

PR approved by at least one committer and no changes requested.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor Author

github-actions bot commented Nov 24, 2025

PR approved by anyone and no changes requested.

@yiguolei yiguolei merged commit 78da615 into branch-4.0 Nov 24, 2025
24 of 27 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot deleted the auto-pick-57456-branch-4.0 branch November 24, 2025 05:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@yiguolei yiguolei yiguolei approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by one committer. reviewed

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@hello-stephen @doris-robot @yiguolei @wyxxxcat