[fix](index) should not use light index change for bloom filter index#35214
[fix](index) should not use light index change for bloom filter index#35214xy720 merged 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
Conversation
|
Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris. Since 2024-03-18, the Document has been moved to doris-website. |
|
run buildall |
|
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍" |
|
TeamCity be ut coverage result: |
TPC-DS: Total hot run time: 170468 ms |
ClickBench: Total hot run time: 31.07 s |
|
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍" |
|
run buildall |
|
PR approved by at least one committer and no changes requested. |
|
PR approved by anyone and no changes requested. |
TPC-H: Total hot run time: 42533 ms |
|
TeamCity be ut coverage result: |
TPC-DS: Total hot run time: 173391 ms |
ClickBench: Total hot run time: 30.97 s |
…#35214) ## Proposed changes Only inverted index support light index change, bitmap and bloomfilter index do not support light index change. Before this pr, if we add or drop bitmap and bloomfilter index, it only do linked schema change, do not rewrite index data for history data.
Proposed changes
Only inverted index support light index change, bitmap and bloomfilter index do not support light index change.
Before this pr, if we add or drop bitmap and bloomfilter index, it only do linked schema change, do not rewrite index data for history data.
Further comments
If this is a relatively large or complex change, kick off the discussion at dev@doris.apache.org by explaining why you chose the solution you did and what alternatives you considered, etc...